There is none. It is DoJ policy that they do not indict a sitting President.
It's certainly not a good idea to do that to the person you work for, let
alone someone capable of pardoning himself and everyone (s)he wants
to protect.
>Ok show me the policy…I wanna see it in writing.
Not sure where you've been but this has been publicized in numerous
interviews. The DoJ doesn't publish their policy for people like you to
be happy, but they do talk about it.
And the power of the President to pardon is abolute. If you don't
understand that, maybe you should try reading the Constitution.
It means they can impeach him or anyone else no matter what. Pardon power
applies only to federal criminal charges.
Not, it has not been tested, but a quick search indicates most legal analysts
agree it is possible. Nixon discussed it (but didn't need it) and Trump
even mentioned it (IMO, to put it in peoples' minds that Zero may have).
The Constitution has everything to say about the pardon power which
is exactly what I said, nothing more. Learn how to read.
What you're really saying is that you're mad that you can't demand from
some anon on this board to do your work for you because you're a lazy
fuck. Go back to reddit. They're missing their idiot.
If it's never tested that would mean it was unnecessary in the first place.
The question is whether or not the SC would accept it if a POTUS did pardon
him/herself, what would they say? Nobody knows for sure, but I'd guess
they'd side with the POTUS, current or former.
The whole point with Zero seems to have been to get them to commit more
crimes. It seems they did, including continuing the original conspiracy. He
couldn't pardon himself for future crimes…
Yes, absolutely in fact. This whole thing is designed (IMO) to pull
in all different demographics. Some are hopelessly lost following
anybody that will give them the answers they want. You see that with
the "rational" accounts like Scott Adams and Gorka - typical conservatives.
Anons in here are the ones that won't ever believe those types, but
we're quick to follow so-called "conspiracy theories." They're going
to slowly reveal to every one of us what happened in a way
that we'll each accept. The path for those following Gorka is
vastly different than the path we're following.
You didn't have to, but it's relevant. It's not my fault the DoJ isn't making
you happy by spoon feeding you the anwers you come in here demanding,
then insulting people that offer answers that you don't like. It's pretty
pathetic in fact.
One thing is likely true: if there are a bunch of secret pardons, then Trump
is aware of them. They'd need to be filed in a way that makes it clear they
were issued before Zero left office. He doesn't need to reveal them until
after everything goes down, if ever for that matter.
There's no Constitutional provision for that. I know a lot of people want
that to be true, but there's nothing anywhere that says it can be true. What
is true is that it will be very easy to negate everything through normal
means, i.e., eliminating EOs, repealing laws, etc. My bet is that some,
if not all, of his appointments will resign in disgrace (they'll never be
trusted any way).
It may be written down somewhere, but I've only ever heard them
talk about it in interviews.
I'm just talking about appointed judges. They'd be "illegitimate" in the
sense that Zero shouldn't have been POTUS. those would be the ones
resigning out of shame, not because of any wrongs they may or may
not have committed.
Yeah, those are the ones he was goading into committing more crimes.
Nothing can be done about past crimes if they are pardoned. Them's the
breaks I guess.