Anonymous ID: ba78df April 10, 2019, 8:53 a.m. No.6121259   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1292 >>1709

>>6121125

>>6121131

 

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ic-legal-reference-book/foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act-of-1978

 

20

Sec. 105

FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978

(5) Paragraphs (5) and (6) of subsection (e) shall apply to this

subsection.

(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, officers,

employees, or agents of the United States are authorized in the

normal course of their official duties to conduct electronic surveil-

lance not targeted against the communications of any particular

person or persons, under procedures approved by the Attorney Gen-

eral, solely to—

(1) test the capability of electronic equipment, if—

(A) it is not reasonable to obtain the consent of the

persons incidentally subjected to the surveillance;

(B) the test is limited in extent and duration to that

necessary to determine to capability of the equipment;

(C) the contents of any communication acquired are

retained and used only for the purpose of determining the

capability of the equipment, are disclosed only to test per-

sonnel, and are destroyed before or immediately upon com-

pletion of the test; and

(D)

Provided,

That the test may exceed ninety days

only with the prior approval of the Attorney General;

(2) determine the existence and capability of electronic sur-

veillance equipment being used by persons not authorized to

conduct electronic surveillance, if—

(A) it is not reasonable to obtain the consent of per-

sons incidentally subjected to the surveillance;

(B) such electronic surveillance is limited in extent

and duration to that necessary to determine the existence

and capability of such equipment; and

(C) any information acquired by such surveillance is

used only to enforce chapter 119 of title 18, United States

Code, or section 705 of the Communications Act of 1934,

or to protect information from unauthorized surveillance;

or

Anonymous ID: ba78df April 10, 2019, 9:41 a.m. No.6121739   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6121671

>>6121652

 

Too many coincidences in that sequence of events in my opinion

 

Too Many Batman Coincidences

Batman thread on what wouldv'e been Heath Ledger's 40th birthday 4/4 posted at 4:49. Q post Talking to you. 2 days ahead of schedule 1 year delta on 4/7. 2 days before 4/9 when POTUS tweets a video with the Dark Knight Rising Theme. All started with a ready made blank meme pic posted by Flotus. 2 days ahead of schedule

 

>>6119205 (PB)

>Isnt JFK Jr tied into the Dark Knight? I'm a proud RFag since day 1, so this caught my eye instantly.

 

>>6119218 (PB)

>I was not aware of the Jr association. Very interesting. Care to elaborate, because I honestly don't follow the JFK Jr stuff at all.

 

See >>6112765 (PB)

>"the Dark Knight Rises" was released on

>JULY 16 2012 in NYC

>the 13th anniversary of JFK jrs plane crash.

>At the end of that movie, Batman fakes his own death in

>a plane crash!!!!

 

>>6113326 (PB)

>Very, very interesting.

>A message sent?

>https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1115716910556090368

>Oh Eye know there is more to this than meets the Eye.

 

>>6119180 (PB)

>Dark knight(night) rises?

>The Great Victory(awakening)?

>Pretty sure this is a message to the anons