>>6127217 (lb)
>>6127124 (lb)
>>AG Barr admitted he had no evidence to support his claim that spying on the Trump campaign “did occur.”
But he believes there was and is intent on investigating it to see if there is evidence to support it. Sounds like a legitimate legal sequence to me.
>He gave the dems their worst possible answer IMO. Nothing definite for them to try to debunk. Now they'll have to try to run a smear job on him to poison the results. Gonna backfire. They're on the hook for manipulating the justice system to destroy people. They are going to prove that's actually what they do by trying to take out Barr who's willfully taking the spotlight on center stage in an attempt to fix it.