Anonymous ID: f0df48 April 10, 2019, 9:01 p.m. No.6130620   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0677

Timely to review the MSM's how the Dem smear machine inserted into the MSM narrative that speculated on the use of the 25th Amendment:

 

Breitbart article on Michael Gersen Op-Ed

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2017/10/15/former-bush-aide-michael-gerson-time-to-panic-about-potus-wapo-explains-how-trumps-cabinet-can-remove-him/

 

Gersen's Op-Ed in WaPo

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/republicans-its-time-to-panic/2017/10/12/5775d558-af76-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html?tid=sm_fb&utm_term=.6d58cb4657e1

 

WaPo's vid, How does the 25th Amendment work?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA6hNs_bB5M

Anonymous ID: f0df48 April 10, 2019, 9:05 p.m. No.6130677   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0681

>>6130620

 

WaPo got the ball rolling. NYT and so forth soon followed.

 

Even the pro-Trump media seemed compelled to discuss the 25th narrative. Debunking or criticism of it served to promote it, ironically, across the MSM. The usual suspects appeared as talking heads to keep the balloon in the air.

 

Timing? [RR]? Seems to have been considered as a potential story/actionable item amongst the cabal's players within the Obama holdouts during transition and first year of POTUS Trump. But [RR]'s wear-a-wire reveal was almost a year and a half later?

Anonymous ID: f0df48 April 10, 2019, 9:26 p.m. No.6130827   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6130613

 

Such a discussion would be item one in discussion of their basic insanity. Kek.

 

Assuming it was an earnest discussion during which the premise – PUTIN was just that influential somehow – was held to be a given, consider just how much they over-estimated the man that HRC and Hussein had tried out their "reset" strategy. Oh boy.

 

On the other hand, if they thought that PUTIN was as good at using their own smear tactics as they are, and using tactics to produce opportunities to blackmail and so on, then, maybe it is just a matter of it-takes-one-to-know-one.

 

Again, kek, just kek.

Anonymous ID: f0df48 April 10, 2019, 9:43 p.m. No.6130979   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1020

>>6130680

 

Describe breathing. Now, is it something you let people do? If yes, under what circumstances can you have that sort of power over breathing?

 

Try another way. Someone is suddenly highly emotional. Rage, sadness, despair, afraid, pick one of the strong emotions – even joy. Then think of allowing someone to breathe.

 

They catch their breath. Now you will have their attention. If they do not set off again.

 

So, let them react, let them breathe, then offer them the opportunity to respond to the next moment during which there is a gathering of thoughts, memories, and new emotions that come with a review of what got them where they find themselves at that moment.

 

Then there is the reckoning, one way or the other.

 

What is the saying, nothing focuses the mind better than … ?

 

Suppose a black hat has been living out delusions of grandeur. Reality bites.

 

Why is the saying, karma is … ?

 

We are watching a movie? Theme?

Watch the death scene that may be apt here.

Starting at mark 02:08.

https://youtu.be/FTjuy-2ttzU

 

https://youtu.be/FTjuy-2ttzU?t=128