A theory Anons,

Given everything we know about the elites need for "pure" blood (of the innocents, no less), the Red Cross (we need your blood!) being mixed up in all this, Al Gore carrying around a suitcase of blood for his "hemophilia" etc.

We also know about the predictive programming of Hollywood, in this case the long running trope of "vampires" and their membership of the "elite."

In another QR bread I was reading about the symbolism of the McLeod tartan sported by FLOTUS recently, and how this could be a pointer to the McLeod phenomenon which very likely runs in royal bloodlines, specifically King Henry VIII, already well known for his executions/murders. You can read about this here >>5529768 (off-bread). The disease is linked to the X chromosome, hence significantly affecting males more than females, since males have only one X chromosome. Hillary may have the double whammy.

So you've got actual royal bloodlines with a heritable blood disorder, with symptoms that match Kuru in many ways including seizures and severe behavioral issues that begin to manifest mid-adulthood. And then we've got "fiction" about mid-adult appearing royals who must consume others' blood to survive and are murderous in their taste for it.

If we leave aside the supernatural/Hollywood aspects of vampire lore, and just consider the symptoms of such a condition, is it possible our actual modern-day royals, descended from and inbred with historical royals, are simply unromantic, but equally murderous actual vampires?

Maybe why they are looking quite ill these days?