>What if Q told you (((they))) had the site, but we have the source. What would that mean to you?
What it SHOULD mean is that (they(the c_a)) control WikiLeaks and what it does.
We have the Source = we (white hats) have Assange.
Of course, (they) will try to wreak havoc. (They)
don't want Assange to spill their ugly beans.
Like anything else recent from the deep state,
this is pure fodder for the masses, has no base in reality.
Just more lip service from those who can not perpetuate their lies anymore. Same thing as the meltdown we are seeing in Congress… they know their cooked, but continue doubling down on their bull shit.
Their dark overlords are doing the same thing here. More non-sensical crap to support what we already know to NOT be true.
(They) are hoping to keep the sheeple happily grazing while the truth fles by right over their heads.
It's our job to let that happen.
Pretty retard conclusion to arrive at
Even for a Glowing Fucking Clown
You better go read a couple moar chapters in
your 'how to be an online black hat'.
No shekels for you!
If somebody is paying you to think:
1- you'd be better off here with a different boss
2- they are not getting their moneys worth
ps It serves one well to check the META Thread every now and then to keep current with board related common knowledge.
JA's views are related to exposing TRUTH,
not peddling political agenda.
He goes out of his way to NOT do that as far as I have seen.