There is a LOT to unpack in this post. The shell game with the black community has been going on well before LBJ, and the deception being played there runs much deeper than just gov't programs, poverty, and "statistics", although a combination of all that has stirred some of the most divisiveness, socially, than anywhere else. Keep in mind, though, that it's a division program that they have run in places all over the world, successfully, and USA is no exception, nor is it immune, to how it works. As a matter of fact, the USA is extremely vulnerable to it. But think about statistics for a moment. You have to contextualize it if you are going to even weigh what they have to say about the "problem".

If you are going to have good statistics, you have to have good data. We all know the data is skewed, especially the census data. That's why the census is so important at this stage in the game. I think the plan is already in place, and "things are going to happen", regardless of the public display in the MSM and political circus. So, I don't think it's worth the energy to be too worried about that. But part of the problem is with the statistics you read. For example, divisionfags love to point out that 13% of the population commit 50% of the violent crime in the US. Now think about this for a second. If you think that particular portion of the population in the US rests at 13%, you live in a bubble; I'm just going to leave it at that. There are literally programs in place that encourage population booms in this demographic, and it has worked really effectively at harvesting the vote from this block. I know you guys love to point out abortions in this country, and who gets way more of them. But to say that the current welfare "state" is anything but incentivising to those that wish to remain on the system is an argument not based in fact. To add to that, if you think for a moment that Q doesn't know this, and that a major part of the plan is to reconcile the enemy's divisionfaggotry to get people thinking for themselves again, and not reliant on the enemy's double-speak, you're missing out on a particular of the "long game" at play, here. It will literally take 1-2 generations to have a massive correction to that problem, but it's part of the plan, nonetheless.

To add to that, Violent crime itself is a specific category. Why do they play into that category? That's because it's a segue to the next part of their "argument"; introducing things like genetic differences (MAOA gene), bell curve distribution of IQ, graduation rates, test scores, and life "choices". People are bombarded with cherry picked "facts" until they start drawing a conclusion that has been crafted for them. Now you have a feedback loop into a confirmation bias. Once you've managed to get the observer that far, it only gets worse.

People looking for answers to the questions of "why we're so different" also start noticing things they never really gave a second thought about before. Exceeding overrepresentation of IR couples in commercials, TV shows, movies, and the real biggy - porn; and the reason "all that adds up" is because people are ignorant enough to subject themselves to it, while also being observant enough that their "coincidence detectors" kick in, and then they see who's behind much of it. That's right, many of the individuals that have made it this far in their "research" have already built in a coincidence detector; leaning towards a conclusion that there's a group of people out there looking to stir up all sorts of problems, but in this journey for understanding, they've already come to the conclusion that the purpose is to wipe out certain demographics so that the ruling class can have their way with whatever is left. This is confirmation bias in the 1000% percentile. It's irrefutable to the observer (black, white, Asian; doesn't matter) because the generalizations all add up in their perspective.

>>6150817

Here's the thing, though. Very few people in the world are actual racists. A racist is someone that literally hates someone because their skin tone is different. That's a rarity. The next category up, though, are people that claim to be race realists. Race realists like to point to all the examples above as "evidence" to back their claims of differences in ethno groups. Some would say it's "high brow" racism. Opponents would say they are just feeding into an existing racist tendency without considering that person's real-life experiences with government sponsored integration/multiculturalism. You'd also have to be willing to dismiss the scores of data from sources ending with ".gov". A lot of people end up here, as they get older, and younger generations have a tendency to rebel against what the generation before them leans in to. Changes in programming on MTV from the 1980s to the 1990s is a PRIME example of this in pop culture. Do you honestly think that 13% of the population are driving over 90% of the public acceptance of what's "in" and what's "out"? Think about it.

Finally, we get into something that really seals the deal for many, and is the nail in the coffin of the conversation. The shutdown of the conversation itself. Having adult conversations about our differences as ethno groups 'gets you labeled a racist. Even if you don't have a single hate-laden bone in your body, and love all people of all colors/ethnicities, and even go to a black/white church, the very moment you even bring up differences with each others' backgrounds, you are labeled a racist, and any conversation is immediately shut down. If I were to tell someone my upbringing in a one-page essay, people would assume I was black because, statistically speaking (read: confirmation bias), white people "don't live on housing, food stamps, get raised by their grandparents (whoopins and all), eat collard greens and fried chicken and watermelon, fail miserably at school, and work jobs like auto detailing" while they are trying to help grandma/grandpa pay bills"; but I sure as fuck did. When the conversation is shut down, there can be no real progress made. So, in the end, the very low percentage of people that can get themselves out of that environment end up doing so as quickly as possible because they see it as a never-ending problem, and that problem is only expanding. Rapidly. Like, really rapidly.

And now we're full circle back to the LBJ point you brought up (sorry it took so long). FDR stoked white flight to the suburbs with the 1949 housing act. City ordinances and state governments crafted the zoning needed to create enclaves in the inner cities. Everyone that's been to a major city knows precisely what I'm talking about. When the civil war was finally over, everyone didn't just shake hands, and accept everyone. If they had, American blacks as an ethnic group would almost be non-existent. Nope, what happened in the US is the same that happens everywhere else. Enclaves were formed. Those enclaves were formed because people are more comfortable around what they are familiar with; for one reason or another. That's human nature just as much as it is government policy. They were formed way before policy drove it to be that way. Policy just fed into the loop that was already there. Then, LBJ came along, and HUD was created. What did HUD do?

>>6150820

It literally created housing developments for the indigent/poor that were already living in the inner cities. Where did it create those new enclaves? Right in the middle of the suburbs! You think this solved race relations? Of course not. It made them MUCH worse. Everyone knows this, and we're right back to the feedback loop of confirmation bias in the systemic problem of racism in this country, just like all the other countries where they've done this exact same thing, over and over again. This is how they did it in Russia. This is how they are doing it in Europe. This is why things like "white flight" aren't phenomena; they are a fact of multicultural civilizations; something driven by observation, predilections, and most evidently, confirmation bias. In the US, space is "running out". You either live where you work and "deal with it", or you drive 1-3 hours everyday, commuting to your job because you adamantly do NOT want to live where you work. In Europe, however, there's "nowhere to move". The game there is simple; spread your legs and accept multiculturalism (women), and social castration (men), or you will be punished by law. It's working insanely well, too. But the social themes there are common themes here, too.

For men, it's "demasculinization" (again, socially, but sometimes physically!) as made evident by sportsball and pop culture. Everyone has this perception that "one is weaker than the other" and that, too, gets played into the public psyche as a sign of superiority/virility over the other. People eat it up. Feminists love to throw that in the mens faces. Once you've divided the sexes up, 2 things happen:

1. Men check out (MGTOW - another movement designed by them)

2. Women take an active leadership role in "caretaking" to the "minority" (or in the case of Europe, imported migrants). It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out where these situations go.

Every single step of the way in this process is divisionfaggotry, and what Q is trying to wake everyone up to is that we have to work together to fight against the framers of this conspiracy. Does that mean we're all the same? Nope. Does that mean that all statistics are moot? Nope. Does that mean we need to abandon all identity and culture to win this battle? Nope. But what it DOES mean is that we're being asked to put patriotism and love of country ahead of all that in order to accomplish the end game, which is evil routed out. Not just from our government and institutions, but from ourselves and our tendencies to pre-judge based on race/religion/culture.