As Q posts, we all tend to dig into the newest information and lose the big picture at times. That's not a bad thing, because sometimes it takes a short period of focus followed by reaching apparent dead ends to force us to sit back and relook at things.
The recent steel tariffs responses led me to look back at the "bringing back coal" responses. The way the left describes it, the 140kish thousand people employed by steel, along with the lower % of people working in coal make sense to those intellectually looking at the problems in those industries and what these solutions bring. The relatively small impact of these changes individually can cause some to lose sight of what DJT is doing. But when you look at the bigger picture, which the media of course will never do, does it all come to light.
Steel is the combination of iron + coal. By bringing one back, it automatically increases the strength of the other. Sure coal is still used for a very substantial portion of our electricity nationwide, but if we're going to come to a point of a better energy source, ramping up steel manufacturing is the only guarantee of strengthening and maintaining the coal industry. Those that work in those industries can see this, but the common people won't put the two and two together because the media misdirects them to the financial benefits limited to each individual industry in a comparison that serves to mislead.
The bigger picture needs to be shared. I think that's another way of looking at the MAP. We focus so much on details in our redpilling and sometimes we forget to pull back and show how everything connects. Details are important but think about how the US Map showing red areas impacts those that look at it. The details aren't as important.
So with Steel, point out coal and how the entire manufacturing industry has so many layers and that they all need to be strong to bring it back.
With HRC, the individuals don't matter as much to the organizational chart of where the money flowed and connected. Same with Trafficking. The individuals will be dealt with, but showing the $$ and locations will be better to show people the issue than just rambling off thousands of names.
The resignations of CEOs and congressmen is the same. If you list off names, it gets lost compared to say 1000+.
We are very detailed oriented and I'll admit I've given myself a headache trying to organize things into lists and connections at times. It works for here, but when dealing with the normies, we're going to have to pull back and look at it like we would a Map. Act like them… keep it simple, keep it stupid.