Seen some of the earliest of Q posts. Was Q using intentional misspellings then?

ie COMMAND AND CHIEF

In another post, Q says something like, "Sessions CANNOT appear to be impartial."

Firstly, the sentence is a double negative. I think the sentence should read, Sessions MUST appear to be impartial.

Is this a kind of antonym word substitution where Q uses the opposite word of what he wants to say? Is this a Looking Glass-speak.

There are orher examples

Post #63- (Q says) "Maybe one day but it CANNOT go slow."

(Did Q intend to say, "Maybe one day but it MUST go slow?)

Not sure what do do with letter substitution. What do you do with COMMAND AND CHIEF?

It should be Commander In Chief.

Command is missing ER and the word AND should be IN.

Also, in post #41, when talking about the collapse of the NK underground nuke test facility, Q posts:

"Shocking no global news agency suspects we had NOTHING (caps added) to do with it."

The above sentence makes no sense as written. But if one substitutes the opposite word for NOTHING, and replaces it with SOMETHING, then the sentence makes sense.

Is this "Looking Glass-speak"?

(I am re-posting this for the Day Shift to ask if anyone has any ideas)

>>6138449

What do you get from that? Is it word substitution?

Using the intended phrase, Commander in Chief, would mean a missing ER and a substituted IN instead of "and".

Using an intended phrase of Command and Control, would mean only substituting the word CONTROL for the word "chief".

Btw isn't CIC the acronym for Commander in Chief?

And for command and control, thought they used CNC.

>>6138758

Calling in a lifeline Anons.

Any of the players, good or bad, have the initials ER?