Hey, Q. Why do you keep using the 'larp' line, when just as many anons contend you're a psyop by SIS or their CIA/NSA lackeys? Straw man?

Why not acknowledge you disingenuously convinced everyone Barr was a good guy, despite your conspicuous failure to note his CIA past and his complicity in covering up Reagan administration crimes?

For that matter, why have you falsely compared Trump to Reagan and JFK, stating Reagan was an "outsider" - when anyone worth their salt knows how much CIA activity was evident around Reagan's installation (and Carter's ouster)? Do you presume no one read NSDD3? Were all anons born yesterday?

https://consortiumnews.com/archive/xfile.html

https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/archives/reference/scanned-nsdds/nsdd3.pdf

Why was that false information "necessary"? You've got a habit of misleading anons when it serves your narrative. Do you think we're dumb?

Be sure to thank your boss for us. We really appreciate the bullshit.

>>6139588

With brilliant followers like these, it's no wonder you chose memes as the preferred form of communication, Q. Rational arguments are so far beyond them it would take a thousand years for the light from a reasoned analysis to reach them. Fodder for functional illiterates.

Assure us your ConOp isn't a larp, again.

>>6139595

These idiots think establishment Fox News is somehow now a purveyor of 'truth', because an anonymous source cites them constantly, and because they're playing the controlled opposition role in this narrative, which is all predicated upon SIS/CIA astroturfing.

There's no educating them. They think they're 'the news now', so they behave exactly as the MSM - sycophantic regurgitation of anonymous 'sources' and mindless dismissals of critical thought.

Clockwork.

>>6139737

They've been placated. Told their 'savior' has arrived. No need for them to be skeptical anymore. No need for 'Yellow Vests'.

>>6139679

Bingo.

>>6139689

It's obviously some form of a contracted operation (ConOp). It regularly asks anons who clearly have no record of researching political history to accept straight out bullshit. Of course, the falsehoods serve the narrative being pushed.