>>6140675 (pb)
Here's another typical response from the retarded, replete with a meme (because rational retorts aren't possible when you lack the capacity for reason or any basic articulation of thought).
Note, my assertion was that too many anons buy All the bullshit served up by Q, and run with it, 'NSA now run by good guys' is just one example of just how stupid the thought process gets here.
What, exactly, do anons think the 'digging' they've been encouraged to do here is accomplishing? Any crimes committed do not require anons to learn or spread. Any crimes could (and should) be litigated in public (no 'sources and methods' bullshit).
The public has a long history of accepting properly prosecuted accusations of criminal activity, and nothing 'dug' here helps that process. "We have everything" precludes anons' relevance as a 'researching' force, and your 'ignorant' friends don't need anons to 'enlighten' them if it's properly adjudicated for the public.
It's only useful if the actual evidence will never be seen - which should tip anons off to where all of this is going.