>>6140396 PB
>Every House Democrat but one cosponsors bill intended to let biological male athletes compete against females in pubic schools
Ok, so, if I am female (XX), and I take testosterone as an athletic drug so I can beat out my female counter parts, do I get disqualified for the drug use in sports?
Because so called female XY is naturally doing the drugs without those natural testosterones being called into question.
How exactly is this equality?
>Where are the feminists who are supposedly protecting women?
>Too many special interest groups on the left that contradict each other.
True, what you say. But here it is. Real feminists don't bother with the trivial. Wasn't trivial when you weren't allowed to own anything, sign a contract, vote, or otherwise be an adult that could take care of your children if something bad happened to the father of your children.
The largest cause of death of any woman's husband between the age of 18 and 45 is death in the workplace. Then there is the occasional war. Men (fathers) do dangerous things, and sadly, often die from it.
Women (mothers) had to change the world for the better, so they could be "second adults" in the family.
Notice the bitching now about how when women "given a choice" will choose careers that work well for them, and not bother competing with men? People are puzzled by this but should not be. It has never been about competing with men. It has always been about being allowed to be an adult and make sure we did not starve widowed like we use to. It was about getting the laws out of the way that were harmful to families.
Today, if Dad wants a break from work, or has a serious surgery, or otherwise gets hurt, mom can read, she is allowed to write, she can own a car and get to work, and give Dad the break he deserves.
Funny how marriage use to be about being there for the other guy, and now, it's like we're not allowed to give a shit about one another. Sad.
Women are pretty calm now, so they pay for fake feminism. Stupid shit for stupid kids who never thought of living in a vacant box or some shelter with four kids cuz dad died defending the country, or working his ass off.
>A woman on steroids still cannot compete with men of equal athletic/sport experience. Women who do juice are FAR FAR and away stronger than their non steroid gal pals, but are also significantly prone to tendon tears, and other injuries.
>Women cannot compete with men on a physical level.
I agree with you completely, nor should women want to do such a thing, It's not a good idea to set your body up so that when you have children, your tendons tear up etc. You need that body to turn into the "rummer bones" that it does to bring a new human being into the world.
My point was that women CAN beat other women taking steroids and hormones, and would be disqualified for it. WHY would "these so called women" not be disqualified for being on hormones? More an intellectual question.
We need more of these. This is the real issue. And if we looked, we might even find dual citizens with allegiance to other nations in that DC crowd. How would we find out. If someone has dual citizenship, is that public record on some site somewhere?