I’ve once again read both transcripts of James Baker, and I’m positive, James Baker was sent in as the equivocator. He knew what he had to do. Never agree with the questions and answers or the knowledge of congressman, but it seemingly only happened on the Republican side. He was quite agreeable when democrats asked question, very few if any disagreements with their questions or conclusions. James Baker went in to reinforce the high minded glory and honour of the FBI has as stated by Strzok, Page and others. He was the closer for the public, if they were ever get the transcripts to prove beyond a doubt, they were just doing their job. He even reinterprets the powers of the President no one will look up what the Constitution says. If you see patterns you see the pattern. These people are despicable with their intrigue and brainwashing of the public

Just remember Anons, you don’t remember anything if the FBI asks you questions. “I can’t recall”, “I don’t recollect”, “no I don’t remember that”, “this sounds silly but I was so busy I don’t remember any interactions”, “no I don’t know who was at the meeting”, “can you repeat the question”. There’s so many more of these dodges that I believe they are all equivocators!

equivocate

verb

equiv·​o·​cate | \ i-ˈkwi-və-ˌkāt \

equivocated; equivocating

Definition of equivocate

intransitive verb

1: to use equivocal language especially with intent to deceive

2: to avoid committing oneself in what one says

Other Words from equivocate

Synonyms for equivocate

Synonyms

fudge, hedge, pussyfoot, tergiversate,waffle, weasel

>>6145556

Absolutely they’ve all been trained in reinforcing the narrative. Lerner made the mistake of pleading the fifth but continued to explain herself. The fifth says, which was repeated by Strzok, Page and Baker “hard stop, period or something like that”. They all said almost exactly the same thing! It’s tiring but informative