Anonymous ID: ee1371 April 11, 2019, 7:23 p.m. No.6145481   🗄️.is 🔗kun

POTUS said today (paraphrasing) that treasonous bad actors should be glad that he was president and not someone else (clearly implying leniency, imo). Reminded me of the time right after inauguration when ppl boo'ed the Clintons and POTUS said not to boo that they were good ppls etc. I can't tell if he is trolling (((or))) that once he wins bigly, he is too quick to let scum off the hook bc it is all about the winning for him? Thoughts Anons???

 

Man, i hope this is not allowed to stand…

Anonymous ID: ee1371 April 11, 2019, 7:37 p.m. No.6145692   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6145519

My gut tells me that POTUS is leaning toward JA being a solid asset but i am not confident that anything has ever been communicated definitively; thus, POTUS is not even confortable playing cards close to vest, but, for now, letting Barr hold the cards until JA can be fully vetted and his terms heard.

Anonymous ID: ee1371 April 11, 2019, 8:09 p.m. No.6146092   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The fact that the Mockingbird Media did not have their Gannett talking points nailed-down today with regard as to how to handle the arrest of JA, tells me they had no idea JA was getting arrested (which is shocking given the fact that JA mother announced that this would happen), and that their comms have been weakened. I imagine by Monday they will have their narrative synched and we will know for certain how to regard these developments and how positive these circumstances will be for POTUS (believe the opposite of how CNN portrays the arrest). We have strong indication that Hannity was tipped on how POTUS regards Assange currently– don't think Hannity would have been so positive in comments towards JA if he were operating blind. JA is a delicate situation for now…must read the tea leaves, imo.