Testimony?
Well, somewhat.
Consider, Assange gets a pardon to stand up and say: "Hillary did it?"
No. Media will have a field day with that. "Man about to go to jail or be killed says things to support man who pardoned him."
Posobiec isn't a good writer of scripts. Assange must be put through trial for the information he holds to be valid, and it must be dragged out with evidence.
No shame in being the one to get everyone's coffee, but you'd better use that time to pay attention and learn.
Depends on if you think those insurance files are real and 'you' feel confident you have destroyed all the keys.
The fact that Assange was hidden out the way he was suggests to me that he was out of options and most of his keys were compromised. Or… Perhaps what is in those files is truly a sort of mutually assured destruction sort of scenario… Assuming the information in them can be distributed. As such, Assange views himself as a piece in a larger game. IE - he doesn't see himself as an animal looking to survive, but as the keyholder for a concept far greater than himself, and as such the only reason to ever activate the HALO array is in a situation where scorched earth is better than the alternative.
Which begs the question of why he would be hauled in front of cameras. That is the last thing I would have done with the guy, especially if he wasn't in on the proverbial plan. You don't drag people in front of cameras so they can signal their networks.
I question who that is in the video we see. It may be Assange, it may not be. Given the history of people being offed on their way to court or arrest, I find the public spectacle an unnecessary risk. It's an ultimately irrelevant detail as Assange is going to be here in the U.S. for his trial - but there is a point in disinformation. If the man in the video is not assange, then what does it mean when people suggest he is signalling something?
Networks are being probed and monitored. Keep your head on a swivel.
Of course he is.
Here is how this is going to play out:
Jack: "Assange good guy."
Trump: "he is part of an active intelligence network that has conducted ops against the U.S."
Jack: "ZOMG! Trump are betray maga!"
Of course the big media is going to ignore the phenomenon. They don't want to put Q in the primetime.
What happens, however, when you put Q into a search engine because your friend told you about it or you saw it in a hashtag?
The push into the broadcast news is going to be "the Q." It's coming pretty soon, my instincts tell me. But, there again, my sense of time is very different. Five years us short term, immediate planning to me. So, "soon" and "imminent" even when I am trying to compensate still translates to months.
Orbital artillery on station and ready to deliver.
Free electron laser interlocks released. Chirp from 1mm to 50um, six second burst, full duty. Accelerator ring charged to 6 yottajoules, full discharge across resonator set.
Wrays of Light?
I am largely jesting, but really, if you were to set a howitzer up there, you could do orbital bombardment at will.