Is it fair to say that anons with a little better understanding of habbenings than normie Q-followers and a LOT more understanding than those oblivious to Q, should act as though we are out of the "learning phase" and teaching/explaining things to others should be pretty much done on a "face-value, suitable for all public consumption" level from here on out? As in, not diving very deep on proofs or number affiliations in a manner that might make things "too understood"? I guess I already know the answer. The choice to know (deeper and deeper layers) will be ours/theirs if so sought out. I feel like I want to pass certain understandings on to others, but maybe during this "rollout" phase in the public eye, that can't be done so much without discretion/discernment.