Anons,
I noticed something yesterday that I wanted to bring to everyone's attention—including and especially Q / Q+. I'd really appreciate authentic anons chiming in too.
When Lindsey Graham was questioning AG Barr (yesterday or the day before) in an open hearing, there was a moment that stood out to me in a very troubling way. Lindsey was asking Barr a hypothetical question, and he referenced the Chinese spy who was (up until recently) in the employ of Senator Feinstein. It is obviously a pretty uncomfortable subject—especially with he in the room—but both Graham and Barr looked more uncomfortable than did Feinstein herself.
Barr had a look on his face for several seconds that was totally contrary to the confident look that has been generating praise and memes here on the board. It almost looked as if his expression was something along the lines of "I can't believe you (Lindsey) just said what you said." Barr didn't look amused at all, and he didn't look embarrassed for Di-Fi. Instead, he looked stunned, as if there were something more complex to the exchange.
Lindsey had more or less the same type of expression, perhaps a bit more anxious even… stumbling a bit with the wording of the question, etc. The troubling part was when the camera cut to Feinstein—because she looked noticeably less uncomfortable than either of them. Aside from being odd, it made me wonder if there was something serious in play.
My immediate thought after seeing that exchange was of the odd Instagram posts by Cindy & Meghan McNoName—announcing the sudden/tragic death of their dog—in an as-yet unspecified "accident." The posts had all the hallmarks of Comey's "Benji died" tweet (GHWB) and also reminded me of Q's drop "every dog has its day" (NoName). If I'm not mistaken, didn't Donna Brazille also tweet something similar?
In any case, I went back and read the McNoNames' Instagram posts—this time more thoroughly. I was struck by how creepy they felt upon considering that they might be a thinly-veiled threat to Lindsey Graham. Lindsey is somewhat effeminate, as everyone knows. He was also known by most for following NoName's every move, and for seemingly never strayimg from whatever political position NoName was pushing, regardless of the issue.
If you read the posts with those elements in mind, you'll easily see what I mean. When I apply those observations to the interpretation of the aforementioned Graham / Barr / Di-Fi exchange, I am inclined to wonder if Lindsey is under serious duress, due to the message that was apparently sent via the super-weird dog death announcement. I should add—since when does a dead Senator's dog dying qualify as nationally-newsworthy? Most people had no idea that dog even existed… so who cares?
In conclusion, I'll simply say that I wonder if Senator Graham bringing up that subject the way he did—and the reactions of Di-Fi and Barr (described above)—were reflective of some sort of effort to spoil evidence or bias the potential jury pool for Di-Fi getting tried for that… or that sort of thing.
Why did she look considerably more relaxed than they did. Bear in mind, Di-Fi came to the TV cameras at the conclusion of the Kavanaugh hearings and wept—silently—while Schumer spoke. Yes, she's a nasty you-know-what—but she's not beyond revealing her fear, as that latter incident demonstrated.
The reason this concerns me so (real, concern not concern-fagging), is that Senator Graham could really f**k things up if he's being threatened into sabotaging some element of 'The Plan.' I am also, of course, concerned with his safety… but frankly, more concerned with The Plan—i.e., justice.
I've attached the Insta posts, but don't have time to find the clip. (Would greatly appreciate someone adding that—and would greatly appreciate any input, discussion, prayer, etc.) As far as I'm concerned, Di-Fi and both McNoName women are more than sufficiently evil to threaten someone. If I am right, I nevertheless pray that nothing comes of this.