>>6151609 (pb):

"Interesting all the precedent we're setting in the name of freedom.

Even if JA gets pardoned by POTUS, there will be legal precedent to extradite any journalist from anywhere for saying stuff we don't like…

We've been enthusiastically duped into supporting a dictator.

And all they had to do (was) get the libs to agree to pretend to lose their minds. What they hate, we're inclined to love.

Brilliant."

The more retarded here actually think the British would allow an extradition that resulted in the airing of SIS activity setting up the premise for the 'Russiagate' distraction.

In other words, projecting your own stupidity onto others to fit the narrative you've uncritically ingested.

Likely the same morons who've been claiming Assange had been spirited out of that embassy long ago.

There's no penalty for pushing unsubstantiated assertions when you're pretending to be 'anonymous', apparently.

>>6151860

Assange was expelled by Moreno's administration because the US made his expulsion a condition of an IMF loan, retard. Stop quoting anonymous sources.

https://m.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/In-Ecuador-Assange-s-expulsion-reflects-desire-13761102.php

>>6151776

That's as intelligent as trying to redefine citizens as "enemy combatants", something I'd expect from Bush or apologists.

If he publishes information that reveals government abuses, he counts as a publisher in my book.

Whether or not you think he's a "journo" is immaterial.

>>6151916

You replied to a comment regarding his expulsion, child. What's more, your 'explanation' was "Q told me so", just like a retarded child.

>>6151893

Actually, I'm not the OP. I quoted the OP (from last bread) because their point about precedence and anons' sycophantic adoption of anything POTUS pushes was valid. My opinion followed, not quoted.

>>6151960

It's so obvious you retards now think Assange did something wrong by airing bullshit to the public. You'd have chastised Drake, too, I'm sure.

Just a good little apologist for the war machine, masquerading as something other than a statist - you've got a lot of company here, anon.

>>6152030

"I trust CIA employees who were complicit in covering up Reagan administration crimes, because an anonymous source told me he's a good guy."

Hopelessly retarded.

>>6152042

They'll excuse anything, because brainwashing and propaganda work.

>>6151778

These morons get their ill-informed asses handed to them when they leave the silo, regularly, on boards all across the spectrum. Then they come back here and pretend it didn't happen.

>>6152123

Troops sent to foment war based upon falsehoods might have to look in the mirror once in a while. There's no sense in pretending they should've been there in the first place. Just a scam on top of a scam, and little statists pretending it's oh so bad to expose the bullshit.

I hate statists and apologists for forever wars.

>>6152123

"..state secrets are sometimes put in place to protect the safety and security of not only operatives, but civilians as well."

Pravda lines. 'It's for your own good.' Like 'we can't expose all of the crimes, because it would be chaos (for elites).'

>>6152385

It was never any more than an echo chamber.