Semantics…
Democrats are trying to shift the debate to semantics on 'spying.'
Folks. There is no debate spying happened.
Intel assets, human informants and wiretaps were used.
Call it 'surveillance' if you want.
The issue is whether it was legally predicated.
'Evidence suggests it wasn't.
twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1116752420590301185
>Semantics…
The prosecutor could have said "deliberate and forced cessation of another individual's life without legal justification." Instead, he said "murder."
twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1116706507888873473
twitter.com/CillizzaCNN/status/1116163817568972810
[archive.is/7UKif]
CNN (without evidence) is still claiming to be a journalism outlet.
twitter.com/dbongino/status/1116756230154989569
CNN is right. With the exception of FISA surveillance warrants, foreign & domestic spies employed to spy on the Trump team, the use of National Security Letters, record numbers of unmaskings,& the use of foreign intelligence to spy on the Trump team, there’s no evidence of spying
twitter.com/dbongino/status/1116756937368952833
CNN: There’s no evidence the Trump team was spied on.
Also CNN: “British intelligence passed Trump associates' talks with Russian on to US counterparts”
#Idiots
twitter.com/dbongino/status/1116759370040135680
Last night, @CMC_MarineCorps and @18thSMMC saluted the remains of Staff Sgt. Christopher Slutman, one of the three Marines killed in Parwan province, Afghanistan.
Til Valhalla, Marine.
twitter.com/USMC/status/1116757657593860096
CNN: Media Outlet or Propaganda Arm of the Democrat Party?