Anons don't care. They love big government now that their 'savior' has arrived. Same reason why most here support CIA regime change plans when POTUS pushes them. Herd mentality.
If the CIA regime change plot in Venezuela being pushed by POTUS didn't faze them, this won't, either.
Apologies, anon. My point was that anons seem to uncritically support anything POTUS does, including regime change plots he pledged to end. 'CIA bad' gets plenty of room to spread here, but they support their plots just the same if POTUS hires a war criminal and gives it his seal of approval.
Apologies, anon. My point was that anons seem to uncritically support anything POTUS does, including regime change plots he pledged to end. 'CIA bad' gets plenty of room to spread here, but they support their plots just the same if POTUS hires a war criminal and gives it his seal of approval.
One worked for CIA and was complicit in covering up Reagan administration CIA crimes, the other is an actress.
Not remotely. I suspect he's there to ensure no spillover from the 'Russiagate' distraction hits SIS or CIA in any substantive way.
It's how these people operate.
Especially when establishment proxies get appointed to positions of influence while anons chase Rachel Chandler drops.
Let's go about trying to define 'the press', and which publishers of facts can or cannot expect protections from prosecution.
Because that makes sense.
Not even remotely close to a valuable comparison, and you should know that.
Don't be an apologist for secrecy, statist. The government always tells you you're safer not knowing what they're doing and to whom they're speaking (and what is said), but you don't have to be naive enough to buy it.