>>6153207 lb

A proper analysis must include the following exposure factors:

1. Power level (transmitted)

2. Power level reaching the subject

3. Signal directionality

4. Duty cycle (what percent of the transmission is on versus off?)

5. Modulation - sine wave, amplitude modulation, frequency modulation, on-off continuous wave modulation, etc. etc. etc. too many kinds to enumerate.

6. Penetrativity - is the signal blocked by physical objects in its path? What kind of matter blocks or transmits the signal?

7. Combined intermodulation products of multiple signals arriving at the subject at the same time

8. Does the transmission use techniques such as frequency hopping to avoid staying on the same frequency continually?

I have not seen a proper analysis yet.

>>6153251

^ yes

I posted in a similar vein >>6153259

>>6153327 Just found a cache of excellent memium (a fundamental element, commonly known as memestuff, from which memes are created.) Working it…

>>6153406

Yes - had an acquaintance, a long time ago, who was a broadcast radio technician and had to climb a commercial broadcast tower to do some work up there. The power was supposed to be turned off BUT in that job they always carried a broom overhead while climbing. The broom caught fire. He descended rapidly…

The lesson is that EVERYthing matters … power level especially … also frequency, duty cycle, proximity to various body parts, etc. etc. etc.

>>6153688

Pinterest

>>6153716 Love it, fren!