>>6153199 lb

>>6153197 lb

This morning, Guiliani was trying to tie Assange with Ukraine. I'm betting he knows a hell of a lot moar than we do about Assange's sources.

Here's something else to toss at the wall. Other anon just asked what if Awan set it up to look like SR took the files. Like how IC made it look like Russia took them when they didn't. There's just a whole lot we don't know and have been lied to about.

>>6153209 lb

Obviously, you haven't read the indictment. Assange worked with Manning to take them. That's a crime, faggot.

>>6153249

Some really stupid dicks here think the ends justifies the means and if someone somewhere is killed all in the name of freedom of the press, well, who cares. Rule of law means nothing to them.

>>6153330

and there you are STILL trying to say Assange didn't steal the classified intel. Go learn what conspiracy is and learn the law on the difference between working with someone to steal something vs having nothing to do with the theft of it. Maybe an easier word for a dimwit like yourself to understand is accomplice.

>>6153384

>Seth was WL source for the emails

No proof. Only assumptions. The rest of your post clearly lays out there is much moar than just SR stealing DNC emails and giving them to WL. Again, we have zero proof of what Seth did or did not do. Lot's of circumstancial evidence, but zero proof.

As for Awan, my ass is still chapped that Jessie Liu made it so he could never be tried for any and all non violent crimes, which cyberspying is considered non violent. But, that another issue.

Because of all the classified info, we will likely never learn all there is no the depths of that rabbit hole.

>>6153507

All we have are guesses at this point. It's clear, thought, that Assange is key to alot of information. I just hope it will all be made public.

>>6153567

We all hope you are right. Because anything less will not prevent this from happening again. Something else to consider. IF tribunals are to be used for the major players, States Secrets will prevent most of the information from becoming public.

>>6153618

I did a quick dog on the Freedom Caucus. Did you know Mick Mulvaney was a founding member? hmmmm

>>6153576

Your thoughtful post isn't ignored anon. This just casts yet another iron into an already overcrowded fire. With heads of foreign states so deeply involved, I don't think we will ever find the real story.

>>6153708

Not sure whether to tel you to fuck off for being a lazy ass and not looking it up yourself or be nice about it. Screw it….fuck off!

>>6153790

ThankQ anon. Q asked us about the creation of the Freedom Caucus and I finally dug into it. But I am extremely confused now. Read further down. Trump and the FC were not what you'd call friends. There was bad blood. So, not sure where to go with it now.

>>6153866

hahaha…no worries anon. I was surprised by it as well. Even moar surprised because of the rift between the FC and Trump considering Q leads us to believe the Freedom Caucus is very significant to the plan. It's why I never posted the digs. I don't know where to go with it.