Not a spy, just doing surveillance.
A good number of people who follow Q for information find the "thousands of sealed indictments" angle to be a distraction. Not FE level, but not worth tracking. Of course there are sealed indictments. There are ALWAYS sealed indictments. But the "thousands of them" splashy and flashy analysis is flawed, and does not credibly suggest a queue of pent up "DS/pedo takedown action"
Me too. I want Congress and the courts to be soundly disgraced for not even taking up the question of "is a dual citizen at birth an NBC under the constitution?"
Or I could be an idiot WITH a PACER account, who knows how to read and analyze data. I don't question the cumulative number of indictments filed under seal in the first place. The references say that is SOP for 100% of indictments in some Federal District Courts.
Posse Comitatus was amended in the wake of hurricane Katrina, and there is some sort of "public emergency" (I forget the exact language) exception.
Ultimately, the choice to use US military for suppression of the sort of invasion we are experiencing ends up more a political calculation than a legal one.
That is a good piece of evidence. Plus, he will be looking for a predicate for suspicion going back to 2015. What justified unmasking?
There is no parallel methodology applied to previous years, and likely not possible to do so, because snapshots are taken on a month-to-month basis. Your claim of "50x more than usual" is a naked assertion, no evidence.
Fuck you and your claim I do zero research. I don't give a shit what you believe, I'm just honestly stating what I do, and explaining my justification.