Anonymous ID: 4b280f April 12, 2019, 1:58 p.m. No.6154468   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4481 >>4571

>>6154097

 

interesting you'd take that view anon.

what 'deeper investigation' would you suggest?

As I've stated the 'dangers' of 5G are limited to an increase in the surveillance state NOT dangers from increased exposure to 'hazardous' radio waves.

 

Three factors determine how dangerous radio waves are

  1. frequency

  2. field strength

  3. duration of exposure

The combination of those 3 parameters determine if it's safe or deadly or something in between.

All the data I've seen on 5G indicate it will lessen the field strength people are exposed to by a significant factor as compared to normal cell tower power levels

The higher frequencies being used for 5G generally have far less ability to be harmful due to the lack of ability to penetrate tissue.

If you can provide proper published studies that show specific 5G frequencies and field strength exposure levels are harmful I'd like to see them.