Technology = double edged
Most tech can harm; vehicles, guns, electricity, fuel rods, chemicals, etc.
Should we have stopped when it got dangerous?
Or did we proceed more cautiously?
If we shut down our nuke technology, America safer?
If we shut down our MIL tech, America safer?
Is the same true with 5g?
>5G is a specific application of existing technology. It's not a unique technology in and of itself.
Still a technology.
If they have 5g and America does not, who has the advantage?
>but that shouldnt prevent anons from expressing their concern
If you want to express your concern, express your concern.
Correlation does not equal causation.
It's GOOD to release the anger with a rant, better than violence.
Deportation is a process.
However, what's more important, stopping the illegal immigration or deportation, at this point?
Also, what do optics allow at this point?
If Anons really want change, they must work to remove swamp creatures, 1by1.
If the court is dirty, does it make sense to try the mafia boss?