>>6153251 (pb)

>anon thinks talking about 5G is a slide.

and why so anon? just because you worked in that industry doesnt make you all knowing.

please acknowledge that 5G implications merits deeper investigation. if you dismiss it straightaway, you are the shill.

>>6154121

possible. but that shouldnt prevent anons from expressing their concern. scalar waves can shatter cells. bad vibrations can destroy water

>>615423

anon already posted

https://mdsafetech.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/biological-effects-of-millimeter-wavelengths.-zalyubovskaya-declassif-by-cia-1977-biol-eff-mm-waves.pdf

>>6154334

>muh scientists

>>6154396

kek

>>6154402

>>6154468

can you guarantee that concerns regarding millimeter wave radiation are dismissable? pic related.