Anonymous ID: 0cead3 April 12, 2019, 2:27 p.m. No.6154837   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4848 >>4871 >>5522

>>6154783 lb

>www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-fumes-over-white-house-plan-to-release-immigrant-detainees-in-sanctuary-cities

 

i still don't get it…

they're not making sense

 

<“The extent of this Administration’s cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated,” Pelosi spokeswoman Ashley Etienne said in a statement Friday. “Using human beings—including little children—as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable, and in some cases, criminal.”

 

<She added: “The American people have resoundingly rejected this Administration’s toxic anti-immigrant policies, and Democrats will continue to advance immigration policies that keep us safe and honor our values.”

 

cruelty?

sure looks like Pelosi REALLY does not have a high opinion of sanctuary cities.

wtf?

Anonymous ID: 0cead3 April 12, 2019, 2:31 p.m. No.6154895   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6154865

<spends days/nights here complaining there are no people left but just bots

<now asks:

>Why aren't THE PEOPLE involved

<as if the process wouldn't be fucked up by shills among the people (or the bots, yes, sure)

Anonymous ID: 0cead3 April 12, 2019, 3:02 p.m. No.6155298   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6155227

yeahyeah fine.

but looking around just produces endless reports of outrage at her comments,

and i don't get it.

the fantasyland version of 9/11 is insulting garbage anyway.

Anonymous ID: 0cead3 April 12, 2019, 3:21 p.m. No.6155606   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6155560

>delete shill posts when found?

only supposed to delete in extreme circumstances of spam & self-doxx.

otherwise they're basically mods & the less they do, the better.

 

also they can see our posting history, and it's often educational to see collected works of shills.

(and sometimes they vet bakers, that seemed to become a big thing at some point but looks like less so these days)