Anonymous ID: 65a479 April 12, 2019, 2:36 p.m. No.6154957   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6154869

I think this is NOTABLE because of where it appears. Other anons agree, "changing the narrative" put in front of the passive normies.

 

NOTABLE

Anonymous ID: 65a479 April 12, 2019, 2:48 p.m. No.6155110   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5123 >>5189

>>6155050

Even if he wasn't assigned Indonesian citizenship (he probably was), he was a dual citizen at birth, following the sham of a BC he offered the public. He was a full-bore UK citizen via his father. Assuming at least for argument he was born in Hawaii, he was born a dual citizen.

 

Is a person born a dual citizen also a natural born citizen? Congress never took it up, but the Senate bothered to make a sham pronouncement re: NoName.

 

Courts had opportunity to weigh in, and turned the issue away.

 

Utterly failed institutions. They have no moral claim to respect.

Anonymous ID: 65a479 April 12, 2019, 2:53 p.m. No.6155168   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5188

>>6155100

Then there is the possibility they are "true believers," in it for personal gain like Stalin, Lenin, Jim Jones, and assorted other degenerate but charismatic people. It's garden variety common for scum to get into positions of power.

Anonymous ID: 65a479 April 12, 2019, 3 p.m. No.6155280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5292

>>6155123

Yeah, there are statutory means in place so parents away pass citizenship. Those are not NBC, for sure, see Rogers V. Bellei, a 1970's case. Citizen at birth on account of a statute, yep. But tak eht statute away and they are not citizens. First citizenshp act had a "shall be DEEMED NBC" clause. DEEMED is legal code for "false, but we will pretend it's true." There are current US laws that deem 26 year olds to be children, for purposes of that law. Legals fictions are fine, but have boundaries. The first naturalization act was amended to remove that NBC association. The fact that the authors used "deemed" in the first place shows they didn't think born abroad was NBC, so they had to "deem" the birth so. Otherwise there would be no need for the law.

Anonymous ID: 65a479 April 12, 2019, 3:11 p.m. No.6155431   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6155252

I don't trust him, but I like most of what he's doing. In fact, I think he's friggin' awesome, best president since Washington, and I kid not. I'm sure he'll make some compromises I dislike, but that's just the way the world rolls.