6G
>>6157021 (pb) Re: 6G
Yes! 6G proposes to integrate 5G with satellite coverage, integration of blockchain and AI in SDRs and possibly new modulation schemes and technologies that dramatically improve capacity, throughput and latency. Therefore 5G must be implemented, so that we can transition to satellite-based communication, in an economical manner (read: affordable for the masses), ie, 7G — Satellite communications are expensive (think iridium).
https://www.academia.edu/34768681/6G_Technology
https://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/31446-lets-talk-6g
POTUS seemingly strange tweet embracing 5G and encouraging the move to 6G means he’s encouraging American innovation — something in the past has been stolen and outright sold to other countries.
“Interest in 6G has picked up momentum in recent weeks, even more so after US President Donald Trump’s tweet saying American companies must step up their efforts towards it. Now the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has created a new category of experimental licenses for use of frequencies between 95 GHz and 3 THz, and this week industry and academia are meeting at a ski resort in Finland to map out the first collaborative effort to draft a joint vision of what 6G might look like.
The FCC is keen to encourage development of new communications technologies and expedite the deployment of new services in the spectrum above 95 GHz. It said there are substantial opportunities for innovation in these frequencies, especially for data-intensive high-bandwidth applications and for imaging and sensing operations.”
https://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1334466#
Check out the attendees for this 6G summit held a few days ago. Did you notice who wasn’t there?
http://www.6gsummit.com/program/the-1st-6g-wireless-summit/
Having said all that, there’s f*ckery afoot as DARPA is on the leading edge of technology development here in America and they just want James Bond level spyware on individual Americans.