tyb
>Daily Reminder that QAnon is controlled by the Mossad and Chabad Lubavitch
Remastered version of original Q - The Plan To Save The World.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qvfUkQTG5QHP
Subtitles can be found on youtube. https://youtu.be/KVeDKuHPDK8
Think
Nothing to see here.
The Mystery Of Julian Assange's Cat
Julian Assange's cat wears a striped tie and white collar as it looks out the window of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in 2016.
Ecuadorian President Lenín Moreno seemed annoyed when he announced an end to the seven-year residency of Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London:
"We've ended the asylum of this spoiled brat," he said.
But what about the asylum of Assange's cat?
The WikiLeaks founder, who was arrested Thursday, has been charged with conspiring to hack into a Pentagon computer network. Presumably, Assange's alleged illegal interactions with former Army intelligence officer Chelsea Manning are the main interest of law enforcement.
Then there is the matter of paw enforcement. (Sorry.)
While holed up, Assange famously acquired a cat. The cat, named Michi, is more well known by its social media moniker, Embassy Cat. More than 30,000 Twitter followers, and 6,000 on Instagram, followed the self-described master of "counter-purrveillance."
Embassy Cat tweeted regularly beginning with its arrival in May 2016. Cute photos were the norm, with just a bit of political grandstanding thrown in — always with lots of puns. (Embassy Cat was proud to be a "#whiskerblower.")
But by the fall of 2016, its tweets had become much less frequent. In 2017 the cat tweeted only three times. In 2018, twice. It has been silent for more than a year. (The Instagram account has been crickets for more than two years.)
Catch up on the latest headlines and unique NPR stories, sent every weekday.
The New Yorker reported in 2017 that Assange's interest in the cat was less as an animal lover and more as a master of his own brand. "Julian stared at the cat for about half an hour, trying to figure out how it could be useful, and then came up with this: Yeah, let's say it's from my children," the magazine quoted one of Assange's friends as saying. "For a time, he said it didn't have a name because there was a competition in Ecuador, with schoolchildren, on what to name him. Everything is P.R.—everything."
The cat arguably played a small role in Ecuador's decision to end its asylum agreement. Moreno explained that Assange treated his hosts disrespectfully; late last year the embassy implemented a series of rules for Assange, including a requirement to be responsible for the "well-being, food, hygiene and proper care of your pet." If Assange didn't, the embassy threatened to put the cat in a shelter.
In other words, it is likely that Assange didn't effectively clean up after his cat's own wiki-leaks.
After Assange was picked up Thursday, some people wondered what would become of Embassy Cat. "My sympathy to the cat," author Charlie Stross tweeted.
Journalist James Ball said that although he offered to adopt the cat, it was "reportedly given to a shelter by the Ecuadorian embassy ages ago."
But according to Hanna Jonasson, whom The Washington Post describes as a member of the Assange legal team, Assange was incensed by the threat to put Embassy Cat in the pound. "He asked his lawyers to take his cat to safety," Jonasson said. "The cat is with Assange's family. They will be reunited in freedom."
Wherever the cat is, it's no longer at the embassy. The Italian paper la Republicca wrote in November that the "friendly atmosphere" at the embassy was gone. "Not even the cat is there anymore. With its funny striped tie and ambushes on the ornaments of the Christmas tree at the embassy's entrance, the cat had helped defuse tension inside the building for years. But Assange has preferred to spare the cat an isolation which has become unbearable and allow it a healthier life."
The Ecuadorian Embassy in London did not respond to a request for comment. But a spokesperson told Sputnik that the cat hasn't been with the embassy since the fall. "It was taken by Mr. Assange's associates," the spokesperson said. "We are not a pet store, so we do not keep pets here."
https://www.npr.org/2019/04/12/712719377/the-mystery-of-julian-assanges-cat
Q said
Server or JA = truth exposed (SR).
ITS ALL HAPPENING
PANIC IN DC!
BIG MISS on this anons…
What Will Breaking Up Big Tech Take—and Could It Spell Disaster for Marketers?
Big Tech is now more than just big. It’s mammoth—and continuing to thrive. Facebook and Google already account for more than 60 percent of digital ad spend in the U.S. Then there’s Amazon, which already dominates nearly 50 percent of the U.S. ecommerce market. It’s the duopoly’s biggest digital advertising competitor at less than 7 percent of digital ad spend, but experts anticipate it will gobble up more digital ad dollars in coming years.
Their domination across many sectors of the U.S. economy—not just advertising—has caught the attention of legislators. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) made headlines in March when she called for the breakup of companies like Amazon, Facebook and Google, which she said were hurting small businesses and stifling competition. Warren’s plan would entail spinning off some of those companies’ marketplaces and exchanges, plus reversing recent tech acquisitions, like Google adding DoubleClick and Facebook acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp.
Additionally, Rhode Island Rep. David Cicilline, a Democrat who heads the House Antitrust Subcommittee, recently declared that the Federal Trade Commission should investigate Facebook, suggesting an appetite for the kind of major antitrust action that the U.S. hasn’t seen in decades. The FTC in February created a task force dedicated to looking at Big Tech, including reevaluating mergers in the sector found to have anticompetitive effects. Across the pond, European regulators are slamming companies like Google and Facebook with fines over anticompetitive business practices.
All of that has made marketers—whose advertising dollars feed Big Tech’s massive profit margins—wonder when the hammer might drop on the lucrative marketing platforms. But it’s not time to panic just yet. The road to a Big Tech breakup is long, winding and full of complications before regulators slice Facebook in half. If it does happen, it will force marketers to think differently, and some experts see a path where they could even benefit from a breakup.
Breaking up big tech won’t be easy
For the last 35 years, U.S. antitrust law has been evaluated relatively narrowly, based only on whether consumers are harmed. The approach, associated with academics from the University of Chicago’s economics program, usually determines consumer harm based on price increases, and wouldn’t immediately account for Big Tech companies that let consumers use their products for free.
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, a former economist for the Federal Trade Commission and professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business, said it’s unlikely that even the biggest tech companies meet the present standard for major antitrust action.
“The concern of antitrust policy is consumer welfare, not consumer and producer welfare,” said Abrantes-Metz, who studied at the University of Chicago’s school of economics. “… These small businesses that people like Senator Warren are concerned about, those are not consumers. They are producers. Those are competitors. And that doesn’t, in my view, fall in the context of antitrust policy.”
The companies also haven’t reached a size in the market in which they operate to set off regulators’ alarm bells. In recent antitrust cases, like one brought against Microsoft in the 1990s, regulators didn’t step in until corporations controlled up to 90 percent of the market, Abrantes-Metz said.
That could change. Tech companies could engage in potentially violating conduct, like price discrimination, or balloon to a size concerning to regulators. There are efforts to once again interpret antitrust more broadly, paving the way for more aggressive antitrust action. In the meantime, some academics are working on applying existing antitrust interpretation to Big Tech’s business practices.
“There are a huge number of ways to get to the same goal … but the actual details of what a fix look like remain to be worked out,” said Barry Lynn, the executive director of the antimonopoly think tank Open Markets Institute. “Will the ultimate fix result in a restructuring of these organizations? I believe yes. And will it result in a new form of behavioral restrictions, somewhat in the form of the net-neutrality and common-carriage restrictions we already have in this country? I strongly believe yes.”
More at https://www.adweek.com/digital/what-will-breaking-up-big-tech-take-and-could-it-spell-disaster-for-marketers/2/
((([Him]))) today…
The @TrigonHotels Group host Suicide Prevention Workshop by Breaking The Silence Cobh.
If you dare click fagbook link below:
Full story.. https://www.facebook.com/1504011426522164/posts/2348634638726501/
Track ALL Suicides; Expect A LOT More
Q
!CbboFOtcZs
10 Jun 2018 - 9:16:25 PM
Track ALL suicides.
Example 1:
Think Spade.
Trace to Children Foundation(s) (NY).
Trace to Import/Export.
Trace from China/MX to Long Beach.
Trace sale/spin off of Co.
Trace to CF.
Trace to Port (Security Clearance Profile (L5)).
Who granted?
Hussein/HRC.
Expect A LOT more.
Q
Teacher’s Aide Arrested For Sexually Assaulting Child; Cops Fear Additional Victims -
https://breaking911.com/teachers-aide-arrested-for-sexually-assaulting-child/ … …
422 uncovered pages of FBI documents showing Evidence of “cover up” by Barack Hussein Obama Agencies related to classified information in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails within Platte River Networks
Public demands HRC & BHO be tried and put in Prison!
Docs show Platte River Networks’ use BleachBit on Clinton server. BleachBit program was downloaded from vendor called SourceForge at 11:42am on March 31, 2015, according to computer event log & over the next half hour, was used to delete the files on Hillary Clinton’s server.
June 15, 2015, memo for the record prepared by the ICIG regarding the State Department’s review of Hillary Clinton’s emails indicates among other things that the retired foreign service officers that State was using to review Hillary’s emails were not “not optimal.”
An August 4, 2015, interview by the FBI of State Department IG Steven Linick mentions an incident on “May 13, 2011 2:28 am Huma – Phil Rein potential hack.”
>An August 4, 2015, interview by the FBI of State Department IG Steven Linick mentions an incident on “May 13, 2011 2:28 am Huma – Phil Rein potential hack.”
… against Hillary Clinton’s server, requiring him to “reset password.” The documents show that Pagliano was paid $40,337.86 over 4r years by the Hilary Clinton Executive Service Corp.
Also, Archives requests “that the Department contact the representatives of former Secretary Clinton to secure the native electronic versions with associated metadata” of the 55,000 hard copies of emails provided to the State Department.
November 2012 classified emails from Jake Sullivan, Clinton’s top foreign policy adviser, discuss a “Report of arrests – possible Benghazi connection” with Hilary Clinton.
A request for travel dated November 2015 shows that the FBI dispatched special agents to Spain & Bahrain to conduct interviews in the “Midyear Exam” regarding a “sensitive investigative matter.”
Other released materials include letters from Clinton’s personal lawyer David Kendall throughout the production. On June 24, 2015, Kendall writes to State Department Inspector General that the State Department is in possession of “all Secretary Clinton’s work-related emails”
He continues that, as Hillary Clinton’s personal counsel, “We continue to retain a preservation copy of the .pst file containing the electronic copies of those e-mails, on a thumb drive that is stored in a secured safe at the offices of Williams and Connolly”
A3 is Hilary Clinton personal counsel, we continue to retain a preservation copy of the .pst file containing electronic copies of those e-mails, on thumb drive that is stored in a secured safe at offices of Williams & Connolly LLP, 725 12th Street NW, Washington DC 20005.