>>6160451 PB 5G Evil

>How hard would it be to setup an legit experiment to prove whether or not 5G produces auditory phenomena? I'm not a physicfag but it seems like you could sit someone in a room with a transmitter and sweep the frequency until the subject reports a sensation and then turn the transmitter on and off to rule out false positives.

I'm not a physics fag either, but it sure would be nice if this could be done…. like yesterday.

What the hell is the push for this 5G crap all about anyway without conducting some decent experiments?

Something is not right.

They are just trying to march on as if we all approve and we are just going to die if the "streaming" does not run a little faster.

Well, got news.

Eyes have limits.

Humans have physical limits that cause High Definition to become useless at some point, it all looks the same.

People have health concerns.

People are able to be permanently damaged while sitting in a building?

Ya think thinking people would be asking questions.

SO what gives?

Why is everyone in government, everywhere, up down, left, right and in between like…. crickets?

Even Q….. crickets.

Very evil bad feeling about this 5G shit.

VERY very weird what's going on with it.

I kept thinking maybe they are aware of some crazy nano dust that we could get showered with, and maybe they are developing some kind of weapon to take out that dust to defend the country, and they just don't want to freak people the fuck out?

WHooooo the hell knows.

All I know is that if the stuff gets set up and so much as one person is damaged.. well, that is what guns are for.

Just start shooting out the towers as fast as we possibly can…. I guess.

When even the good guys in government do not want to talk about it, that is really really not good.

>>6160487 PB Killing Incest with the Ohio Heartbeat Bill?

This is a good thing. Errs on the side of life. Gives women a chance to make a decision in that span of time where 50% of all conceptions are spontaneously aborted anyway.

But the biggie here for me is all the pedo dads/uncles/step fathers are going to have to lay off their daughters/sisters. (Don't get me wrong. I love men. Have 5 great brothers, and most excellent father. Problem is most guys are so decent, they cant even imagine what is really going on out there. It would never cross their minds to do what the statistics are saying is happening out there. Problem with men is their decency most times.)

Had a pedo uncle who molested his daughter all the time, so, experience with that.

These days they just walk the daughter child <childinto the clinic and force the abortion on her.

I rescued a young woman this happened to last year in Florida. Parental forced abortion. (This time it was a mother who forced the abortion on her. She lied to her daughter to convince her to do it, and when the daughter found out that that she was told was a lie, she ran away from home with grief, and felt like a murderer.

I have not figured out if the child was the victim of incest yet. It has not come out of the kid.

Now, because of this bill, criminal fathers, step fathers and the like will have a hell of a time trying to figure out if their child sex toy got pregnant this month or not. Trust me, six weeks is close call. You will have to have that pregnancy test kit ready, a number of them, to get under the wire. This is hard to do if it's someone else's body you are testing.

And if they are pregnant, and they have to carry to term, it would be nice if we could all deal with some facts here, instead of assuming all underage pregnant minors are whores or something? I would like someone in Ohio to repeat the research that was done in the 70's.

I know.

Really awful subject.

But it needs to be up front in the conversation.

Here was the research and results that surprised everyone:

In late 1977 (I just graduated high school)….. and then again a few years later on the Phil Donahue show, there were two separate studies done (anonymous surveys) where young women in the hospital, under 18 years old, were asked to check a box that described the relationship of the father of the baby to the minor who just delivered.

Each study did about 1500 women, traveling to hospitals everywhere to get the data.

All possible relationships were covered. They just had to check the box with "boyfriend" or "husband" or "father" or "Step father" or "brother" or "stranger" etc…and drop the result in a box anonymously.

Turned out that 47% in one study and 49% in the second study checked boxes indicating a relative was the father of the child.

I wish I had sauce. There was no internet.

Phill Donahue, and Dan Rather maybe, about 1977-78.

The nation was shocked.

It was never talked about again.

But as far as we have ever scientifically looked, it looks like almost 50% of female minors delivering live birth are victims of incest by uncle, brother, father, step father, etc.

So. These days, maybe we should repeat the research, and then start criminalizing incest too. In the meantime, hopefully, the pedophiles will lay off out of fear of getting caught.

So, the bill may be tough on grown women, but, in the end I suspect it will help the girls.

>>6161514

>won't get any traction anon because the media and feds dont want it to now why would that be? what else do they cover up?

Man. Wow.

Sad to say, anon, but, good point.

>>6161491

>>6161517

>No mention of drug addicted mothers selling(pimping) . All bad actors men in your "story" ???

Honestly? The reports were so short. Just the results, and a description of the survey which was just a bunch of check boxes. Then… crickets, for what, 40 years now? I WISH we had more information.

But you bring up a really truly valid point anon. After seeing what this mother did to her daughter, I would suspect you are spot on in MANY cases. As I said, I have a lot of respect for men…. because the men in my life have been of such excellent character.

This is why I suspect that back before Roe v wade, all those babies that were adopted out were actually stolen from minor children by force, and most likely by force of a parent.

>>6161544

I suspect you are absolutely right. Not everything we have to "wake up to" in this great awakening is going to be pleasant, that is for sure.

>>6161491

>>>6161547

>>now we are 2019…and the big push is DNA testing on the baby, which we think is being done w/o consent anyways. Now add the DNA kids that popping all sorts of interesting peccadilloes on people. E.g. Wait..what?? I have a sister/father not MY father…. whole other family. Some cases caught wrong baby at hospital errors. Imagine how incest turns up on these DNA reports. Trust me someone knows the report is probably running data on a DNA database. If it exists, its on the net. The trick is getting it.

So, you are thinking that the Data base is useful for locating pedophiles? That would be interesting.

>>6161574

Exactly how is research on anything this important possibly a shill diversion?

Oh… I forgot. Vested evil interests need ignorance to succeed.

Q research is just a name. No one is supposed to do any real research.

Take the mandatory ignorance shill accusations elsewhere.