>>6164285 lb
Assange Leaks:
If you look at your image a lot of them have dates on them like 2008, 2009, 2010 in the titles.
Why would they put all under 1984 if the dates are in the 2000's?
>>6164285 lb
Assange Leaks:
If you look at your image a lot of them have dates on them like 2008, 2009, 2010 in the titles.
Why would they put all under 1984 if the dates are in the 2000's?
EXACTLY.
https://file.wikileaks.org/file/
sauce?
Great work looking into it anon. Yes, they are newly released apparently.
I was wondering where all the researchers were. Seems this place has turned into a Facebook now.
There is a TON of the files.
Yes. New.
I wish we could find some files on Schiff, Schummer, Pelosi, etc…..
Some files on any of the pieces of shit that we have been looking for dirt on.
Maybe we can get more researchers on this.
https://file.wikileaks.org/file/
Why don't we have a separate thread for all the bullshit Facebook shit and celebrity gossip and useless crap 98% of the posts are about?
Nice try to stop researching (which this board is about).
Whether they are new or old - there is more there than anyone could read in a lifetime.
How much have you investigated of the massive drop?
WHY do you care? Makes me wonder.
What research is being urgently done here?
This place has not done serious research in months.
Just post your gossip and bullshit, and let who wants to research do it.
Shill.
A letter to Merkel
https://file.wikileaks.org/file/angela-merkel.pdf