Anonymous ID: eb3d11 April 13, 2019, 4:28 p.m. No.6168009   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8073

>>6167841

>be very bad imo.

 

why?

notables get overlooked quite often

the solution is that anons re-post them

 

IF a truly notable post is done with JPEG and the BAKER doesn't include it do you think some kind anon would convert the graphic and re-post the notable again?

 

nah… never happen

Anonymous ID: eb3d11 April 13, 2019, 4:50 p.m. No.6168198   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8219 >>8229 >>8273

>>6168073

 

yes, I do feel it's important

how long has it been in the global notables?

has it changed significantly?

will it ever change completely if the BAKERS don't make the decision not to include a notable if it doesn't have a graphic & sauce?

IF it has a graphic that is unusable what then?

Anonymous ID: eb3d11 April 13, 2019, 4:57 p.m. No.6168276   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6168219

you're quick with the accusation of shill

and if a graphic isn't viewable it is by definition 'unusable'

after all what is a graphic for?

You can call it inconvenient and say it's not a big problem and you are correct. The world won't end, the website won't crash, people won't quit using this place…

but it is annoying and makes some things more difficult.

As for attacking an anon's work by omitting the post as notable for using a bad graphic, isn't the same thing already done in the case of bad sauce / links ???