>be very bad imo.
why?
notables get overlooked quite often
the solution is that anons re-post them
IF a truly notable post is done with JPEG and the BAKER doesn't include it do you think some kind anon would convert the graphic and re-post the notable again?
nah… never happen
yes, I do feel it's important
how long has it been in the global notables?
has it changed significantly?
will it ever change completely if the BAKERS don't make the decision not to include a notable if it doesn't have a graphic & sauce?
IF it has a graphic that is unusable what then?
you're quick with the accusation of shill
and if a graphic isn't viewable it is by definition 'unusable'
after all what is a graphic for?
You can call it inconvenient and say it's not a big problem and you are correct. The world won't end, the website won't crash, people won't quit using this place…
but it is annoying and makes some things more difficult.
As for attacking an anon's work by omitting the post as notable for using a bad graphic, isn't the same thing already done in the case of bad sauce / links ???