As always, use logic in assessing the alleged WikiLeaks dump.
Personally, I agree with Baker (LB) that it looks like a slide. How to tell? Apply the basic principles of intelligence analysis, a few of which are listed below. OldFags, there are NewFags in the bread now who may not be as familiar with principles of analysis as you, so please mention and describe them to increase the team's capacity for analysis and strengthen the hivemind. Examples of analytical principles include:
-
Always consider the source first. If the source is compromised (comped), the information is highly suspect and probably (but may not always be) misleading. Successful misleading information is typically woven into strands of true information to help conceal its falsity.
-
The age of the information can be an indicator of falsity. Is it already known by the hivemind and available from another source? If so, even truthful information is of limited to no value.
-
Analysis of metadata and other indications of authenticity may help to determine whether the data has been faked, or is legitimate. However, even "legitimate" data can be false or misleading.
-
Finally, look for unrelated signs of "slides". For instance, in the current alleged WL dump, note that the social media sites went down in Europe. The European populace has become more "woke" to Cabal/DS activities, which leads one to propose that this outage is intended to be associated with an attempt to "conceal" the WL dump from them, and thereby prompt EUAnons to dig in the wrong place.
Verify before trusting.