Anonymous ID: ed687f April 14, 2019, 6:51 a.m. No.6173962   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3971 >>3975 >>4122 >>4147 >>4635

Q, "Do UNICORNS exist?"

The unicorn is the symbol of the Boston Marathon — a magical, mystical dream run.

 

BOSTON MARATHON TOMORROW APRIL 15TH

https://journalstar.com/niche/neighborhood-extra/send-off-to-the-boston-marathon/article_090d6ef1-091b-5efb-a228-c061bfe1f25b.html

Anonymous ID: ed687f April 14, 2019, 8:09 a.m. No.6174451   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4469

>>6174397

>There's already been a problem with AI; it's actually began to learn on its own and has even created it's own 'black box' that nobody can get inside.

 

>That should scare the shit out of everyone.

^^^FAKE & GAY…fear mongering

 

Read this…

The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

https://medium.com/@agnesintel/the-ethics-of-artificial-intelligence-53c8601275b4

 

Myth and reality

Artificial Intelligence has been a staple of fiction for many years; many misconceptions and misunderstandings have grown up around AI systems. Most of the fears and ethical concerns about this technology stem from what we see in novels, movies and television, which depict AI as possessing human-like intelligence — or even surpassing it. In these scenarios, artificial intelligence poses great existential dangers to the human race, as well as creating difficult ethical dilemmas and questions about the nature of humanity, intelligence, and free will.

 

The reality is very different. Such scenarios are not impossible, but they are many years, even decades away, and they are far from what AI systems are in today’s world. The advent of intelligent automation certainly brings with it great ethical concerns and grave dangers, just not the same ones we see in the movies.

 

Myth and reality

Artificial Intelligence has been a staple of fiction for many years; many misconceptions and misunderstandings have grown up around AI systems. Most of the fears and ethical concerns about this technology stem from what we see in novels, movies and television, which depict AI as possessing human-like intelligence — or even surpassing it. In these scenarios, artificial intelligence poses great existential dangers to the human race, as well as creating difficult ethical dilemmas and questions about the nature of humanity, intelligence, and free will.

 

The reality is very different. Such scenarios are not impossible, but they are many years, even decades away, and they are far from what AI systems are in today’s world. The advent of intelligent automation certainly brings with it great ethical concerns and grave dangers, just not the same ones we see in the movies.

 

The algorithms and principles behind AI are decades, and in some cases centuries old. Recent advances in processing power have made these tools usable in real time, bringing us the ability to automate non-routine tasks and create tools with limited intelligence and volition. In order to meaningfully discuss the ethics of AI, it is first necessary to distinguish between fantasy and reality. Strong AI, also referred to as “general artificial intelligence”, is what we see in the movies. Weak AI, or “narrow artificial intelligence”, is the reality of what we have today.

Anonymous ID: ed687f April 14, 2019, 8:16 a.m. No.6174510   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4533

>>6174469

>You can't label shit you don't like as fear mongering simply because you don't like it.

Clearly you didn't bother to READ what INDUSTRY EXPERT has to say about your fear mongering…

 

Fantasy: Strong AI

Strong, or general AI is the science-fiction artificial intelligence: fully sapient, human-like machine intelligence. No matter what we see in the movies, machines that approximate human consciousness, with broad understanding of relevance, and the ability to extrapolate knowledge into new fields, are not a reality at this time. There are people working on building strong AI.

 

Perhaps the best thing that can be said of these projects is that they’ve so far been unsuccessful.

 

The field of artificial intelligence is developing very rapidly, and AI tools are getting smarter and more sophisticated by leaps and bounds. However, every advance shows us that human level intelligence is far more complex and difficult to achieve than we previously suspected. Tasks previously thought to require general intelligence, such as playing games like Go, are solved bringing us no closer to this goal. Human intelligence is still unlike any machinery we can create.

 

Frankly, this is a good thing. Consider a virtually immortal entity with greater than human intelligence and speed, no physical boundaries, the ability to replicate itself instantaneously across our networks, and trained with human behavior as its model. This is a situation with few possible good outcomes, and many dangerous ones.

 

The potential ethical issues are deep, murky, and complex. If we build a self-aware, intelligent entity, it would be immoral to enslave, abuse, or to treat that entity as a tool. This is a determination that is extremely problematic to make. The nature of sapience is one of the basic unanswered questions in the history of philosophy. If we decide that there is an “intelligence threshold” for something to be considered self-aware, how do we quantify and test for it? Should the self-awareness standard for non-human machines be the same as for non-human animals? Should these standards be applied to the few humans who inevitably cannot pass the qualifying test?

 

If these questions ever arise they are years, possibly decades away. Some people consider strong AI to be the “holy grail” of artificial intelligence; in my opinion, such an endeavor is horribly misguided. It should be self-evident that there are some technologies which should not be built. It is theoretically possible to build a bomb powerful enough to destroy all life on earth, but only a fool would try. Strong AI clearly numbers among such technologies.

 

https://medium.com/@agnesintel/the-ethics-of-artificial-intelligence-53c8601275b4

Anonymous ID: ed687f April 14, 2019, 8:32 a.m. No.6174636   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6174588

>I believe it's even from the same sauce you used, top kek.

^^No…your source is a blog

 

this is what your source says about contributors…

"No previous experience or application is required to contribute! Whether you’re interested in improving your writing skills, learning more about AI, sharing your experiences with AI, or just looking to get a piece published, we’d love to hear from you. The McGill AI Society Blog seeks to enhance interdisciplinary dialogue about AI by promoting the work of McGill students at both the undergraduate and graduate levels."

 

https://medium.com/mcgill-artificial-intelligence-review/submissions-to-the-mcgill-ai-society-blog-fbff4d23a6f0

 

Learn to scrutinize your sources better

 

My source is agnesintelligence.com <<<INDUSTRY EXPERTS