Mar 10 2018 12:57:48 (EST) Anonymous ID: 167c68 613114
for the record… can you please tell these anons
ES=ericschmidt @snodwen=snowden
ES= does NOT = @Snowden
these people just can't put 2 and 2 together.
——————————————————————————————-
Laying out the fundamentals here for some:
Intel & ALL Data analysis is both science and art.
Science = rules / standard practices
Art = drawing insights/conclusions & assumptions from unconfirmed or gaps in data
Science:
Analysis is roughly organized into 3 buckets.
-
Raw data collection (ie: Q posts / POTUS tweets / News / Other historical facts & sources, etc )
-
Formulate story (stitch together raw data puzzle into coherent story, ie: anons)
-
Executive summary (reducing story to easily consumed bullet points, ie: Twatters / memes, etc)
Steps 1 - 3 is the process. No brainer here, anons get it.
QA of the analysis is critical (Quality Assurance)
-
Raw data collection: Confirmed raw data is "clean", has been validated as solid/not compromised (ie: Q/POTUS/Other solid sources)
-
Formulate story: Does assembly of story follow standard analytics rules & best practices, DOES IT RELY ON ALREADY VALIDATED HISTORICAL DATA?
-
Executive summary: Are correct points highlighted from step 2 for dissemination?
The MOST IMPORTANT step for anons with Q posts would be step 2. Step 2 is where it all happens. Build upon "the Rock" of a sound
foundation and your house will remain, build upon "the sand" of incorrect analytical conclusions and your house will fall.
Step 2 is where the critical insights are drawn together. It is where the deep dive occurs & where actionable insights are formulated into
the important CTAs (Call To Action) that Q is calling for (ie: Step 3 = Exec summary, red pill message dissemination to the broader audience).
Everything built upon Step 2, it is the building blocks upon which all future analysis stands and grows, based on previous blocks.
The MOST IMPORTANT tool that is used in step 2 (Formulate story) is HISTORICAL DATA.
Nothing is more beneficial to ANY analysis than HISTORICAL DATA. Historical data is the golden key. HISTORICAL DATA is mostly void of assumptions, it is a validated historical
catalog of facts. It also contains many repeating patterns (ie: data trends) which help validate the conclusions in the formulation in the story, ie: step 2.
Summary:
Q often repeats: "Re_read crumbs" & "Future proves past" (ie: he's driving this point, look again at historical data, historical data has the patterns, trends & answers)
Q often repeats: "You have more than you know" or (short version) "more than you know". 8 & 16 mentions to date. That is a huge historical pattern.
This could hold a double meaning. "We have more data than we know" (ie: historical data to complete the story) and/or "We have
more power than we know as American citizens"
What does all this have to do with the quoted post above about @Snowden vs ES? (you still awake?)
Q has always used @Snowden for Edward Snowden (never Eric Schmidt). 22 instances of usage or quoted usage. That's a huge historical trend, done deal, stop debating.
Q has clearly outlined ES as Schmidt, pics, timeline, devious activities, resignation, etc, another YUGE historical pattern, done deal, stop debating. Build the blocks!
When Q goes dark for a few days, DONT STRESS WHEN THE NEXT POST WILL DROP. Re_read the crumbs! Dive back into the HISTORICAL DATA, its where the "golden nuggets" of data are STILL BURIED.
Build the Blocks!
Matthew 7:24-27
The Wise and Foolish Builders
24 “Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock.
25 The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock.
26 But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand.
27 The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.”