Baker, I'd like to dispute post >>6176311 as notable.
tl:dr - I think this is a shill operation. See below.
Contrary to the claims of several anons replying to the initial post, the video is quite viewable.
YT puts videos into Limited State fairly including things to do with the current plight of the White race. This is nothing unusual (I think it only takes a single report), and something that all but the newest of newfags are likely to be aware of.
Furthermore, the anon who initially posted the video (adc002) made no further contribution to the bread, except an alternate like (also in Limited State, and with a single response stating that it won't play). Replies to the initial post also seem a little glowy:
>9cadb9
One post. Points out Limited State, implies that clicking link may be an issue.
>10db99
One post, implies 8ch is censoring.
>17e8b5
Nominates for notables, "Read the responses".
Responses to what? Limited State videos have no comments, responses to a posted video here are relevant why? Only other posts are generic, one praising bakers, appeal to religion.
>4837d6
Bigs up the video, pushes White Nationalist content. Gentle sound of "muh jooz" in the background. Other posts are generic, again, one appealing to religion and emotion.
>6d42fc
"Wont play". Only other posts are replying to the second vid and generic observation.
I believe this is a play by shills/clowns to make the board seem antisemitic. They posted the video, then signal boosted with additional posts that stretch the truth.
YMMV.