>tweeting a video that spliced a comment she made about the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks with footage from the attacks.
Keks, spliced. Muh fake. Oh, they mean like an ad or any other produced piece? They are absolutely desperate.
>tweeting a video that spliced a comment she made about the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks with footage from the attacks.
Keks, spliced. Muh fake. Oh, they mean like an ad or any other produced piece? They are absolutely desperate.
Hell Yes Notable
Actually could set up a precedent for msm to be guilty of a lot. If they are encouraging leaks, asking for documents, etc. It’s one thing to be handed material and publish it, another for soliciting it. At the very least, no different than what a “John” does. Worse, conspiracy if leaker and msm working together. Treason if doing so for those reasons.