no one takes you seriously when you post your product with your analysis
you use children as props and that riles people. you should have figured that out a long time ago.
Free Pepe Thistle@ Thistle we love you and we know, everyone does, anyone who lurks here a long long time knows . . .
commentted? what did you say, I must review.
whatever you said, you said in the first person.
I actually know the English language so all the shill-ber-walkki doesn't work on me, so . . .
to put it into a more concise format, and give credit to an old master poet:
"me thinks thee protest too much"
and if that confuses you . . .
I speak English, not shill-neigh-saying jaber.
If you repost a picture that exploits children saying 'see, this image exploits children' you are really repeating the same mistake that the first person made, aren't you?
>6180086
INRI
or was it rather like exposing it all into the antiseptic sunlight of human awareness?
That show was more than just a film, but the performance at the screenings of the audience members.
Seriously not easy to just dismiss it without a deep review of the whole phenomena of it.
One must not loose the context of the movie house at midnight in the college town on a Friday night showing that film for years and years and selling out often, and people dressing up, and playing the parts from the movie and making fun of it.