Anonymous ID: 6aa48d April 14, 2019, 11:13 p.m. No.6182756   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2774 >>2819

>>6182701 , >>6182719 Sounds like an antifa op to me. Quote from the op’s article below. IMO, not a notable Baker.

 

Asked what their ultimate goal is with the hacks, Nama said “our attacks are just like the riots at the streets with police, but its more powerful because we can damage the government more. We can make them lose a lot of money.”

 

Responding to if they have a specific message for President Donald Trump, the hacker asserted that “Trump is a troll. He can’t hold the US. Nothing more for him.”

Anonymous ID: 6aa48d April 14, 2019, 11:21 p.m. No.6182786   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2790

>>6182774 yes she is. Glad anon posted this. >>6182745

 

These subversion controlled opposition pieces have the small hooks in them for credibility, ie the former Trump supporter. Which she never really was. She’s antifa.

Anonymous ID: 6aa48d April 14, 2019, 11:30 p.m. No.6182815   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6182790

Would agree. They may have a trick or two, but as long as this has been planned, I’m sure there isn’t much that surprises the white hats. This type of article doesn’t even move the needle as far as narrative. It’s only reinforcement for those on the left.

Anonymous ID: 6aa48d April 14, 2019, 11:36 p.m. No.6182830   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2871

>>6182816

I have a feeling they don’t have quite as tight of a grip that they think they do. They were caught on their back foot without a counter punch. Been scrambling since. All the scrambling was well prepared for imo. And if they had some unbeknownst counter, well, we know what would happen then. It was checkmate before they ever even knew they were in a game of chess.

Anonymous ID: 6aa48d April 14, 2019, 11:40 p.m. No.6182840   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6182819

I can’t prove that either, but hell, msm can’t prove any of their articles with anonymous sources either. It’s just my gut. Mane not directly, but their tactics and M.O. line up.

Anonymous ID: 6aa48d April 15, 2019, 12:20 a.m. No.6182957   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6182871

>we haven't quite seen the true extent of their "Insurance" yet.

Perhaps not, but as I said, if it’s anything too noteworthy, there is a counter for that.