>“At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government,” Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1823. “Experience however soon shewed in what way they were to become the most dangerous.”
Was thinking about this today, how is it that the courts, or one judge, can basically say, "Nope not happening" to any POTUS executive action. That seems fundamentally wrong in a supposed checks-and-balance system. Constitutional amendment needed?