from Memes 45
>Taking action in support of Edward Snowden, Julian Assange and Kim Dotcom.
So if we don't support these 3 characters that have been offered up on a silver platter as 'anti-establishment' figures, we are giving tacit support to the 'Deep State'? Is that her argument?
So if the objective is to 'dismantle a narrative', then it is necessary to establish a compelling counter-narrative.
Lumping all 3 of those individuals together as a 'superhero squad fighting the real establisment' without fully examining the evidence surrounding each of them doesn't really pass muster, sorry.
Not to mention all the logical fallacies contained in her screed and your responses.
Let me know when you are ready to discuss who is in possession of all those documents that Snowden took (>90%+) that have yet to be released.
Have a nice day.
Who is "the CP king" that is being referenced here?
Am not aware of any such drop. Would appreciate if you could provide sauce.
I just alluded to one in my previous responses. Insulting your target audience does not really help your case btw, just so you know.
Thanks for the info on the 'dupes'. Probably the most valuable sentence you have given in your 28 posts and counting.