Anonymous ID: b96400 April 15, 2019, 9:03 a.m. No.6185774   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6185697 (lb) (poster in desperate need of a 'Barr death star' meme)

 

Oh, I noticed POTUS appointed a CIA minion to AG (and it's not the 80s), just as the AG would be responsible for selling the redacted 'report' on the 'Russiagate' distraction to the public.

 

I also do this crazy thing where I consider a person's past complicity in covering up crimes, especially when those crimes were committed by the same agency whose assets are now under threat of being exposed in a more recent plot in which they astroturfed the landscape to prepare the public for the distraction.

 

I just don't ignore the obvious.

 

Try it some time, anon.

Anonymous ID: b96400 April 15, 2019, 9:20 a.m. No.6185947   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5961

>>6185917

 

CIA man Barr is going to be informing the public of CIA's complicity with SIS assets who initiated the entire distraction? Hope you tools weren't expecting any harm to come to CIA after all this theatre. A few token prosecutions, perhaps - just like the last time Barr was responsible for protecting CIA as an institution.

 

Pathetic, is what it is.

Anonymous ID: b96400 April 15, 2019, 9:25 a.m. No.6186005   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6036

>>6185923

 

Monitoring groupthink generated in echo chambers is a responsibility of anons who aren't trapped in the 'Hope and Change 2.0' propaganda mill.

 

Why are you here? Shelling out uncritical regirgitations of an anonymous source? You don't need to. There are plenty of mil/intel assets already promoting the fever you contracted here. You're just a data point they'll use to validate their efforts here which, clearly, are a resounding success.

 

Remember to 'Keep calm and do nothing', moron.

Anonymous ID: b96400 April 15, 2019, 9:29 a.m. No.6186063   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6121 >>6195

>>6185919

 

And it will later be used to defame and marginalize antiestablishment constituencies who didn't buy this administration's propaganda. These anons will hide behind their supposed 'anonymity' (to everyone but the institutions that matter) and pretend they were never involved - but not before they do the establishment's work for them.

Anonymous ID: b96400 April 15, 2019, 9:36 a.m. No.6186133   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6334

>>6186106

 

So very clever. Keep supporting language designed to criminalize behavior of journalists (the Assange indictment), CIA regime change plots (in Venezuela), and the appointment of establishment pawns all over this administration - like a good, little lemming. Stay 'in tune'.

Anonymous ID: b96400 April 15, 2019, 9:49 a.m. No.6186262   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6270

>>6185871

 

Spreading memes misleading anons into thinking Barr is somehow different from every other CIA asset implanted in successive administrations to control fallout.

 

"That's what we do here." In other words, miss anything remotely approaching relevant context in some misguided attempt to promote a false narrative.

 

Take pride in that, anon. It's quite the service you're doing for your masters.

Anonymous ID: b96400 April 15, 2019, 9:53 a.m. No.6186307   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6372

>>6186250

 

Read the indictment which attempts to paint journalistic ethics in protecting sources as somehow criminal, then regurgitate how this is a movie. Don't pay any attention to the precedent being set by this administration that can be used by subsequent administrations to stifle dissent. Stay safely in the echo chamber at all times.

Anonymous ID: b96400 April 15, 2019, 9:59 a.m. No.6186376   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6450

>>6186334

 

If you think the kid in the photo is the 'Cincinnatus' who initially leaked the documents, and not a CIA cutout intended to assist in the burying of that leak, I don't know what to tell you, other than stop assuming what anonymous sources tell you unless you can independently corroborate it.

 

You just make yourself look like a foolish follower.