Anonymous ID: 507474 March 10, 2018, 7:44 p.m. No.623173   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3243 >>3426 >>9693 >>7383

A bit of knowledge of history will come in useful here. Adolf Hitler was rumored to have been romantically involved with his half-niece Angela Maria "Geli" Raubal.

She was found dead in 1931. Reported as a suicide, but many thought Hitler murdered her.

But what if "Geli" didn't die and she was hidden away? Why hide away? Pregnant. Hitler claimed to be married to Germany. Not to mention a the whole incest thing.

The first daughter of "Geli"/Angela would be named Angela according to German custom.

So Angela Hitler (daughter of Geli and Adolf). Her first daughter would be named Angela as well.

Geli would have been 23 when she was pregnant, with Merkel's mother. Merkel's mother would have been 23 when she gave birth to Angela.

This explains why the photos of the haircut sitting on Hitler's knee and so on look like Merkel because it is Merkel's mother.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 11, 2018, 2:31 p.m. No.631960   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2165 >>3382 >>5010 >>3818

>>629872

The Nazi's were National Socialists. Which is essentially a form of communism.

What we know as communism from the past attempts at it is actually similar to National Socialism. That is because pure communism simply doesn't work and ultimately becomes an authoritarian dictatorship.

Stalin and Hitler were both running the same kind of Gov't. Just packaged differently.

At the end of WWI the Nazi's and German Commuinst party were both fighting each other for power in Germany.

Hitler became the head of the Nazi party and realigned the Nazi political ideology to fit his agenda.

Hitler claimed that German lost the first world war because the Jews and Communist in the German Gov't sold Germany out. Remember WWI coincided with the Russian communist revolution. Russia had a very large Jewish population in those days.

So any form of communism/socialism from eastern Europe was seen by Hitler as being corrupted by Jews. It simply was a non-started from Hitler's perspective and there would be absolutely no way to be allied with the German Communist party.

Hitler simply created his own version of socialism without the baggage.

 

The bigger question is who financed Hitler's rise to power?

After WWI Germany had a shit load of war debt. American financiers financed the German Gov't with loans so Germany could pay the war debt.

When the Great Depression hit the American financiers recalled the debt. Obviously Germany was not able to pay it back.

So what does a loan shark do when he wants his money? He sends the heavy to collect it.

Hitler = the heavy.

Finance Hitler and get your cash back. And that is exactly what he did.

The real brains of the Nazi Party is Martin Bormann. He was basically Hitler's handler.

I am thinking if we ignore the shiny object in the room (in this case Hitler) and find out more about Martin Bormann that will answer all of the questions that Q has asked. No doubt all the money and connections go through Bormann and to Hitler.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 11, 2018, 5:54 p.m. No.634020   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>632501

IDK.. Have you ever tried to read Mein Kampf? Go try to read it.

It is completely incoherent. No structure whatsoever.

If a priest had written it (assuming that the priest was educated in a monastery) it would be completely coherent. Priests basically read all day.

Clergy were the most educated people of the population back in those days. Secondary education was inaccessible to the mass population.

Mein Kampf reads like it was written by a failed artist (Adolf Hitler).

One fact is true. Technically Hitler did not write Mein Kampf. Rudolf Hess did.

While in prison Hitler dictated the text and Hess put it to paper.

It reads in that manner.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 11, 2018, 6:27 p.m. No.634354   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4495

>>634234

Could go on for days about the Nazi links to the EU.

Do think it is coincidence that most to the countries that are in the EU were either Invaded by the Nazi's or were allied with the Nazi's during WWII?

 

The current president of the EU is Jean-Claude Juncker. Aire to Juncker Aviation

Basically the European equivalent to Hughes aviation here in America.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 11, 2018, 6:42 p.m. No.634520   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0993 >>4558 >>4795

>>633851

So yeah we Americans sit here 70+ years later and say. "The Nazis and the Communists were enemies".

Remember the cabal were playing the same game as they are playing now.

Left is Right, Up is Down.

Is US allied with Iran or Iraq?

Depends on the timeframe right?

How can that be?

It is because the same people are funding both sides.

There is no Left/Right or Up/Down.

The coin is the same on both sides.

Most most recent example of this is North Korea.

Why would the cabal fund North Korea?

 

I believe the term is strategic tension.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 11, 2018, 8:09 p.m. No.635379   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6921

>>635010

I think you are missing the point.

What is really the difference between the Dems and the Republicans that we have had over the last 30 years?

They are essentially are the same since Reagan until Trump.

Hitler was offering a new brand of Communism packaged differently. Exploiting the German people's dislike of the Jews.

It would have been impossible for his Nazi party to have an identity if he would have just been a bland alternative to the German Communist Party. Identity politics of the 1930's.

The other main difference is that Hitler was a expansionist in the name of Germany. The German Communist party was a expansion eastern European communism into Germany. Germany would have been a puppet state of Russia in this scenario.

From the standpoint of outside financers/Robber Barons/the cabal, what flavor do you prefer?

Hitler's intention was to replace totalitarian communism in East Europe with national socialism.

It was a race to control the map. The maps was going to controlled by Russian Communism or German Socialism.

 

Hitler used the Jews to light the fuse. He couldn't do that if his was politically aligned with them. That wasn't to say he didn't have backroom deals and pats on the back agreements. Basically saying this is all political grandstanding behind the scenes.

Once Hitler got the power he purged everyone that would have been a threat to him political allies and enemies. In what was called night of the long knives.

 

Hitler hated the Jews, but so did Stalin. I believe Stalin executed more Russian Jews than Hitler did.

 

So again what is really the difference between Hitler's Nazi Gov't and Stalin's "Communist" Gov't.

Different titles and such, put essentially the same. Total state control of all aspects of life and commerce.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 12, 2018, 5:39 a.m. No.638499   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8589 >>8804

>>637122

It was Lenin who instituted totalitarian gov't. This was after the communist lost the national election (after the revolution). The election had been planned prior to the election. Lenin allowed the election to go forward. The communists lost the election. Lenin nullified the results and instituted a totalitarian dictatorship with appointed officials. Stalin was one of the appointees.

The Soviets didn't have National Communism because it is a heterogeneous society.

There wasn't a national identity to have, multiple languages and cultures. China suffers from the same thing.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 12, 2018, 7:41 a.m. No.639233   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3523

>>638804

I am pointing out the fact how the implementation of communism simply doesn't work. The Russian revolution promised communism.

Almost immediately the implementation of communism failed and morphed into a totalitarian dictatorship.

National Communism implies that it is some type of Nationalized form of Communism where people are brought together under a single National identity, culture, and language. It just isn't possible to do this in the Soviet Union. Stalin himself spoke Russian very poorly.

In the end what you really have is a fascist dictatorship that flies the banner of communism/socialism.

What do you have with the Nazis?

You have nationalist fascist regime that files the banner of socialism.

 

Fundamentally they are the same. They both use the promise of socialism to obtain power and institute fascism.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 14, 2018, 6:08 p.m. No.667629   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>667111

Correct.

The NDAP or Nazi Party is essentially socialist at its core. The enforcement wing of the NDAP was the SA (aka brown shirts). The NDAP was a response to Eastern European Communism (Soviet) incursion into western Europe. The same thing happened in Spain (Franco) and in Greece.

Hitler did not start the NDAP or the SA. He joined it and took it over with the help of Martin Bormann. Bormann was to Hitler what Valerie Jarrett was to Obama. A handler.

 

There were many in the Nazi Party and SA who opposed Hitler (see Otto Strasser who started an party called the Black Front all of them are Communist style parties). During the night of the Long Knives Hitler had many of these people murdered and arrested.

HItler had to eliminate the SA because he needed the backing of the German Army. Before Hitler the German Army basically ran the country.

 

Communism/Socialism is for the believers. It always turns into fascism because socialism is a pipe dream. Guys like Hitler and Stalin exploited it to achieve absolute power.

Globalism is no different. Consolidation of power in the hands of the few.

Anonymous ID: 507474 March 17, 2018, 7:27 p.m. No.703293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3736

Occam's razor.

Hitler knocked-up his half-niece. He was on the rise, so she had to disappear. So she disappeared. Probably sent to some far flung corner of Germany that was later occupied by the Soviets post WWII.