>>6189673

>It uses the same principle "us" vs. "them" division: good vs evil. Either with us, or against us etc. most of you are de facto already radicalized.

if my accepting some abstract (in the platonic sense) moral division between good and evil means that i'm radicalized, then this anon says guilty as fucking charged.

the only relation that good verus evil bears to us versus them is the fact that both are 2 part classification schemes. so yeah, there is perhaps some strictly formal sense in which they are alike. but the underlying principles that determine inclusion in the good versus evil scheme is vastly different from that required for an us versus them classification.

you get fucking high marks for your ability to state your fuckwittery concisely.

the rest is your shit is not only weak as fuck but longwinded as well.

>>6189963

just some anon that likes numbers, philosophy and video games. oh yeah, and most of all i love watching the elite squirm cuz they fucking know that the frogs are coming.

>>6190212

>You would think that now would be a great time to bring up that incident and make a really big deal.

>

>McConnell should be asked publically about that video NOW and so should Elanie Chao

very bad idea in practice. it politicizes the issue. which will trigger circle the wagons behavior within the dems camp. theyre fucking destroying themselves already.