>>6190255 (lb)

No, I'm sad about it.

but listen, it's being used to incite people to very hateful positions.

I am trying to show the world how it's just a fire in a building.

demolition is OK if it's planned.

the cabal does it to shock and awe, in a plan, but htey only tell a few people.

so now we are supposed to hate on other because an old buidling, that was probably unsafe anyway, and needed a lot of repair, and probably already looted of any of the gold and gems, burns?

I'm not hating anyone because a building burned, especially a church.

>>6190375

they can name it after Marcron:

dome of the cuck

>>6190387

the smell of smoke

make people woke?

FYI: anyone posting about the cause of the fire, and why and how it's a 'moment' in 'clash', anyone who is pushing that narrative is a division shill.

>>6190517

Imagine how they felt in London in 1940, anon.

read some History.

Paris was a survivor, it had been on the list to be destroyed. It just got a pardon by a man who knew to disobey.

And one part now burns, a kind of strange haulocaust when none was needed.

it only symbolizes the end of the cabals hypnotic hold on the world.

it is nothing about the major religions, or clash of people. It's the death throws of the old age, one last dragon fire breath from the lizzard throats needing anohter symbolic gesture.

but it doesn't mean what htey want to think it means.

It means unity.

it means togehter we will win

it means their days are over.

we will not be devided by this.

>>6190580

oversite to be imprecise

in my hast: please add in 'while attributing it to factions or people'.

of course the 'chemical cause' is ok to discuss. thank you for being a nit picker.