>no one should have been there so it couldn't have been work related.
You have zero knowledge of fire origination to make this comment. I’m not saying it was or wasn’t arson, but your statement is ignorant.
>no one should have been there so it couldn't have been work related.
You have zero knowledge of fire origination to make this comment. I’m not saying it was or wasn’t arson, but your statement is ignorant.
If you are going to come to a conclusion from a still shot of one video from one angle, knock yourself out. But to post it again, with echos and plebbit spacing, well…You do you, I’ll do me.
You know what, I did misfire. But I never attacked you personally. I said your comment was ignorant, not you. I also said you have zero knowledge of fire origination, again, not a personal attack. You certainly could have made your first comment without the secondary attack. Point still would have been made.
Don’t see that fact discussed here much. Wonder why.
Now a newfag, faggot