Anonymous ID: 4dd34a April 15, 2019, 11:23 p.m. No.6196326   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6195915

Not surprised.

In the book of Revelation, there are said some strange things about the mark of the beast that you have to have to participate in the economy and buy or sell something in the world.

1) KJV uses the words IN the hand and IN the forehead.

2) Those with the mark get a grievous sore because of it.

3) And those with the mark CAN NOT ever be resurrected after death.

Focusing on number three is not possible until you read Genesis on it's face with regard to the half breed nephalim. They are abominations. Reading the book of Enoch and the book of Jasher, you see the events of angels abducting women from the angel's point of view in Enoch, and from the point of view of the common man in Jasher.

I would call them Gods recommended Commentaries, because he made sure we knew these books existed.

Most important then is to consider that the only beings that can not be resurrected are those that are genetic mixes. There is something that does not go together right to make resurrection possible.

Add to that the words mark of the BEAST

What does beast mean?

There is something called the "law of first mention" when studying the bible. If you want to know the main meaning of the word, go to the first place where it is mentioned.

The first time the word beast is written is in Genesis, where God is talking about creating the beasts of the field and the animals.

 

Mark of the beast can be restated as Mark of the animal. The genetic mixing of animal.

Think Super soldier.

I am certain that the mark will be altering DNA of the people who get the chip. Only a change in DNA, the creation of hybrid is unable to be resurrected.

There are the nephalim, and then there is the group that takes the mark.

So I am not surprised to find the globalists trying to change the DNA of man.

This is exactly what the evil angels were trying to do by abducting the women. They are out to destroy mankind by destroying our DNA.

That is my guess.

Anonymous ID: 4dd34a April 16, 2019, 12:13 a.m. No.6196544   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6556 >>6579 >>6646

>>6195940

 

>"but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. "

 

Islam is not a religion. It is a theocracy

the·oc·ra·cy

/THēˈäkrəsē/

a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.

 

Therefore it is a government, that is trying to supplant the Constitution.

 

It is trying to hide behind the first amendment to do this.

It will not work.

Sharia law is exactly what it says it is.

LAW.

And it is Unconstitutional law, at that.

So, forget this.

Muslims can not take an oath to uphold the Constitution, because they are upholding and hold allegiance to another set of laws from another governing body.

They have their own Sharia court system.

They have a system of capitol punishment.

Forget the religion thing. It's not even close.