Anonymous ID: 32978f April 16, 2019, 3:28 a.m. No.6197294   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7322

>>6197285

>Did you read that blind though?

If it is the same one I'm thinking of, then yes, I did read it.

I don't know how legit Enty is, but she seems to have been on the money many times and really does appear to have insider info on some dark, dark shit.

Anonymous ID: 32978f April 16, 2019, 3:44 a.m. No.6197367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7395 >>7404

>>6197322

Yeah, that's the one.

Tbh, there is so much that conflicts with the Assange story, that I find it impossible to lean to the left (black hat) or the right (white hat).

Why release the dirt on the Clinton if he's white hat?

Why would she threaten to drone him?

Why voluntarily go into a 7 year self imposed incarceration?

So many questions, so few clear cut answers.

Anonymous ID: 32978f April 16, 2019, 3:59 a.m. No.6197417   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7438

>>6197395

It brings a wry smile to my face when I see so many anons champion Assange as if he's the second coming.

I guess discernment and a truly open and sceptical mind are not for everyone.

I use the British spelling of sceptical as I see a huge difference in its use compared to skeptical. Skeptical, of the James Randi variety, seems to say you are wrong and I'm going to prove it, even if I have to lie, whereas sceptical, suggests an open and critical mind until all the facts are known.