>>6197417 (pb)
Trying to do further digs. A lot of info out there has been shilled with conspiracy fag shit and it's hard to decipher actual info over "herp derp this is what I think" conspiracy disinfo.
Gonna take me down a rabbit hole the next few days I think. If I find anything of note I'll throw it in.
I haven't dug on Assange before as I never felt the need as everything coming from Wikileaks was always something of value or for the greater good (or so it seems on face value).
After that blind though I'm inclined to start just to verify it to myself that there isn't more to it.