Anonymous ID: ad168c April 16, 2019, 4:14 a.m. No.6197465   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7483

>>6197417 (pb)

Trying to do further digs. A lot of info out there has been shilled with conspiracy fag shit and it's hard to decipher actual info over "herp derp this is what I think" conspiracy disinfo.

Gonna take me down a rabbit hole the next few days I think. If I find anything of note I'll throw it in.

I haven't dug on Assange before as I never felt the need as everything coming from Wikileaks was always something of value or for the greater good (or so it seems on face value).

After that blind though I'm inclined to start just to verify it to myself that there isn't more to it.

Anonymous ID: ad168c April 16, 2019, 4:26 a.m. No.6197519   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7545 >>7762

>>6197483

Honestly it's making me wonder if what I believe to have been for the greater good was. Or just another move on the chessboard.

Aware of his family and upbringing. Wondering about associates during that upbringing also.

I myself was brought up in the same era of "online connectivity" in generally the same geographic location, albeit not in a cult environment. So understand what was out there in the way of communication/access in a digital related context.

Anonymous ID: ad168c April 16, 2019, 4:38 a.m. No.6197575   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6197537

Tough farmgirl has got this. Don't worry about the procedure or what could happen that shouldn't. Just worry about seeing here when she comes out fine and well and think about how much better life may be for her after having her hip fixed!

Anonymous ID: ad168c April 16, 2019, 4:40 a.m. No.6197580   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6197545

Thanks for the heads up. Will include whatever I can as I trawl through whatever I can.

Things seem to start to form a pattern or come together for me the more I see things related to the same subject.

Anonymous ID: ad168c April 16, 2019, 4:45 a.m. No.6197599   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6197549

Divide and discriminate by race.

Don't ever judge by merit or achievement, apparently that doesn't matter if you are a certain race (or even appear to be).

I just wonder what if the top bankers are white (and that was achieved on merit) they hope to gain by inserting "non" white bankers who have been unable to match the performance of "white" bankers they hate.

Why can't they just rank them on merit?

"I see you are all GREAT top bankers, why aren't you giving the SHIT TIER bankers a fair go so we get votes?"

Doesn't sound as snazzy or emotionally triggering as whitey is oppressing you.